Figure 3
Moderation of mean-level bias by global relationship satisfaction (i.e., main effects of global relationship satisfaction concurrently assessed and assessed “pre-esm” = before the experience sampling study) for different relationship satisfaction items. The interaction between moderator and mean relationship satisfaction states (i.e., the moderation of tracking accuracy) is included in the models, but not reported here. S1 = Study 1, S2 = Study 2. N (Study 1) = 118, N (Study 2) = 486. Moderator effects that were significant after controlling the false discovery rate at α = 5% (two-tailed) are displayed in black (for relationship mood based on a metap-value of both studies), all other moderator effects are displayed in grey. Figure created with theforestplot package (Gordon & Lumley, 2017), available at https://osf.io/sq7mw/, under a CC-BY4.0 license.

Moderation of mean-level bias by global relationship satisfaction (i.e., main effects of global relationship satisfaction concurrently assessed and assessed “pre-esm” = before the experience sampling study) for different relationship satisfaction items. The interaction between moderator and mean relationship satisfaction states (i.e., the moderation of tracking accuracy) is included in the models, but not reported here. S1 = Study 1, S2 = Study 2. N (Study 1) = 118, N (Study 2) = 486. Moderator effects that were significant after controlling the false discovery rate at α = 5% (two-tailed) are displayed in black (for relationship mood based on a metap-value of both studies), all other moderator effects are displayed in grey. Figure created with theforestplot package (Gordon & Lumley, 2017), available at https://osf.io/sq7mw/, under a CC-BY4.0 license.

Close Modal

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal