Skip to Main Content
Table 3

Significant treatment-specific differences in maximum hydrolysis rates by analysis of variance (ANOVA, p-values < 0.05), where lettersa indicate results of the post-hoc analysis. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1525/elementa.371.t3

TreatmentSurface-water roller bottlesbDeep-water roller bottlesc

Chon (0.03)Fu (0.009)Xyl (0.005)Chon (0.001)Lam (0.02)Xyl (0.03)

 
initial whole water ABc AB AB 
whole water AB 
WAF d AB 
Corexit AB 
CEWAF AB AB 
TreatmentSurface-water roller bottlesbDeep-water roller bottlesc

Chon (0.03)Fu (0.009)Xyl (0.005)Chon (0.001)Lam (0.02)Xyl (0.03)

 
initial whole water ABc AB AB 
whole water AB 
WAF d AB 
Corexit AB 
CEWAF AB AB 

a Rates with the same letters are indistinguishable from one another.

b Differences were not significant for Ara, Lam and Pull (p-values of 0.25, 0.1, and 0.5, respectively).

c The p-value for Pull was 0.7; Ara and Fu were not hydrolyzed in the deep-water incubations.

d Chon remained unhydrolyzed in the WAF treatment.

Close Modal

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal