Comparison method: background selection and application of the kriging approach. Averaged CO2, CH4 and CO emission rates from the nine mass balance experiments (MBEs) i) when the emission rates were calculated by kriging the point fluxes (kriging_Fijk) and ii) when they were calculated and integrated after interpolation of concentrations, pressure, temperature and perpendicular wind speed (kriging_CTPU). For both interpolation methods, backgrounds were defined iii) as linear regression (BGlinReg) and iv) as averages (BGavg). Precision is the standard error of the mean at 95% CL. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1525/elementa.134.t1
Method . | BG . | CO2 emission rate mean (mol/s) . | Precision CO2 . | CH4 emission rate mean (mol/s) . | Precision CH4 . | CO emission rate mean (mol/s) . | Precision CO . | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
. | |||||||||||||
kriging_Fijk | BGlinReg | 14600 | ± | 2500 | 17% | 67 | ± | 40 | 60% | 108 | ± | 17 | 16% |
BGavg | 10400 | ± | 4600 | 45% | 81 | ± | 47 | 58% | 98 | ± | 19 | 19% | |
kriging_CTPU | BGlinReg | 12400 | ± | 3200 | 25% | 56 | ± | 23 | 42% | 92 | ± | 13 | 14% |
BGavg | 11024 | ± | 4300 | 39% | 65 | ± | 27 | 41% | 91 | ± | 16 | 17% |
Method . | BG . | CO2 emission rate mean (mol/s) . | Precision CO2 . | CH4 emission rate mean (mol/s) . | Precision CH4 . | CO emission rate mean (mol/s) . | Precision CO . | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
. | |||||||||||||
kriging_Fijk | BGlinReg | 14600 | ± | 2500 | 17% | 67 | ± | 40 | 60% | 108 | ± | 17 | 16% |
BGavg | 10400 | ± | 4600 | 45% | 81 | ± | 47 | 58% | 98 | ± | 19 | 19% | |
kriging_CTPU | BGlinReg | 12400 | ± | 3200 | 25% | 56 | ± | 23 | 42% | 92 | ± | 13 | 14% |
BGavg | 11024 | ± | 4300 | 39% | 65 | ± | 27 | 41% | 91 | ± | 16 | 17% |