Skip to Main Content
Table 4.

Correlations Between the Two EGQ Scales (Averaged Across the Eight Musical Examples), the Aesthemos Scales, and the DPQS

EGQ
Scale and factorUrge to MovePleasure
Aesthemos, 2: Prototypical Aesthetic Emotions Pearson’s correlation r .834 .873 
95% CI of r [.800, .862] [.846, .895] 
Aesthemos, 4: Animation Pearson’s correlation r .864 .854 
95% CI of r [.835, .887] [.824, .879] 
DPQS Pearson’s correlation r .784 .872 
95% CI of r [.745, .817] [.848, .893] 
EGQ
Scale and factorUrge to MovePleasure
Aesthemos, 2: Prototypical Aesthetic Emotions Pearson’s correlation r .834 .873 
95% CI of r [.800, .862] [.846, .895] 
Aesthemos, 4: Animation Pearson’s correlation r .864 .854 
95% CI of r [.835, .887] [.824, .879] 
DPQS Pearson’s correlation r .784 .872 
95% CI of r [.745, .817] [.848, .893] 

Note. All correlations fulfilled the criterium of p < .001. For the correlations with DPQS, the sample size was N = 455 and for correlations with the Aesthemos factors, N = 372.

Close Modal

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal