Taken by a host of talented photographers, the Farm Security Administration photographs have become the defining visual imagery of the Great Depression. Familiar, beautifully composed, and free from reproduction copyright, these photographs have become an essential tool for interpreting a number of facets of the 1930s, especially that of poverty. As useful as the images are, the nature of their creation and the embedded messages regarding hardship mean that they are not as universal as is sometimes presumed. This article examines how the images facilitate interpretation of Great Depression history, particularly that which pertains to the experience of poverty, and the repercussions and limitations of their use.
A Paradigm of Resilience: The Pros and Cons of Using the FSA Photographic Collection in Public History Interpretations of the Great Depression
Meighen Katz is an early-career academic and curator based in Australia. She received her PhD in 2011 and since then has taught History, Public History, and Urban Studies at a number of Melbourne’s universities. Currently she is a researcher on a grant-funded joint project between Museum Victoria and the University of Melbourne.
- Views Icon Views
- Share Icon Share
- Search Site
Meighen Katz; A Paradigm of Resilience: The Pros and Cons of Using the FSA Photographic Collection in Public History Interpretations of the Great Depression. The Public Historian 1 November 2014; 36 (4): 8–25. doi: https://doi.org/10.1525/tph.2014.36.4.8
Download citation file: