Figure 1. Women’s (solid lines) and men’s (dashed lines) attitudes toward gendered decision-making ( top ) and division of labor within families ( bottom ), 1962–2018. Sources: Intergenerational Panel Study of Parents and Children (IPSPC) 1962, 1977, 1980, 1993; Monitoring the Future (MTF) 1976-7... More

Figure 2. Women’s (solid lines) and men’s (dashed lines) beliefs about the consequences of women combining motherhood with work outside the home, 1976–2018. Sources: Monitoring the Future (MTF) 1976-77, 1986-87, 1996-97, 2006-07, 2016-17; General Social Survey (GSS) 1977, 1985-86, 1996/98, 2004/0... More

Figure 3. Women’s (solid lines) and men’s (dashed lines) attitudes and beliefs about marriage, 1976–2017. Sources: Monitoring the Future (MTF) 1976-77, 1986-87, 1996-97, 2016-17; International Social Survey Programme (ISSP) 1988, 1994, 2002, 2012. More

Figure 4. Women’s (solid lines) and men’s (dashed lines) attitudes toward childbearing and parenthood, 1962–2017. Sources: Intergenerational Panel Study of Parents and Children (IPSPC) 1962, 1980, 1985, 1993; International Social Survey Programme (ISSP) 1988, 1994, 2002, 2012; Monitoring the Futu... More

Figure 5. The ideal number of children according to women (solid lines) and men (dashed lines), including percentages viewing exact numbers as ideal and overall means, 1972–2018. Sources: General Social Survey (GSS) 1972, 1976-77, 1996/98, 2014/16, 2018; International Social Survey Programme (ISS... More

Figure 6. Women’s (solid lines) and men’s (dashed lines) attitudes and beliefs about divorce and the durability of marriage, 1962–2017. Sources: Intergenerational Panel Study of Parents and Children (IPSPC) 1962, 1977, 1980, 1985, 1993; Monitoring the Future (MTF) 1976-77, 1986-87, 1996-97, 2006-... More

Figure 7. Women’s (solid lines) and men’s (dashed lines) attitudes toward heterosexual sex outside marriage, 1976–2018. Sources: General Social Survey (GSS) 1976-77, 1984-85, 1996/98, 2014/16, 2018; Monitoring the Future (MTF) 1976-77, 1986-87, 1996-97, 2006-07, 2016-17. More

Figure 8. Women’s (solid lines) and men’s (dashed lines) attitudes toward cohabitation ( top ) as well as nonmarital childbearing and childrearing ( bottom ), 1976–2017. Sources: Intergenerational Panel Study of Parents and Children (IPSPC) 1980, 1985, 1993; International Social Survey Programme ... More

Figure 9. Women’s (solid lines) and men’s (dashed lines) attitudes toward same-sex relations and marriage, 1977–2018. Sources: General Social Survey (GSS) 1976-77, 1984-85, 1994/96, 2004/06, 2014/16, 2018; International Social Survey Programme (ISSP) 1988, 2012. More

Figure 1. Effects of state shares on the relation between women’s ownership and the likelihood of a woman CEO (predicted margins in Model 4, Table 1 ) More

Figure 2. Effects of foreign shares on the relation between women’s ownership and the likelihood of a woman CEO (predicted margins in Model 5, Table 1 ) More

Figure 3. Effects of industrial sector on the relation between women's ownership and the likelihood of a woman CEO (predicted margins in Model 6, Table 1 ) More

Figure 4. Effects of industrial sector on the relation between female representation in the workforce and the likelihood of a woman CEO (Model 9 in Table 1 ) More

Figure 1. Weighted percentage of support and opposition to paying more in taxes to increase health spending, by country, 2016. Notes: “Oppose” and “support” combine the “somewhat” and “strongly” responses. Response options not shown here include “neither support nor oppose,” “don’t know,” and “it... More

Figure 2. National support for universal health coverage versus GDP per capita, 2016. More

Figure 3. National support for universal health coverage versus percentage of the population covered by government financing arrangements as a proportion of total current health expenditures, 2016. Note: Data on government financing arrangements from the WHO Global Health Expenditure Database ( h... More

Figure 4. National support for universal health coverage versus All Minorities at Risk index (ethnolinguistic fractionalization). Note: A higher index represents more diversity/fractionalization. More