In this paper, we apply Polanyi's double movement to characterize the potential and observed impacts of public-private and public-philanthropic partnerships for the development of pro-poor value chains. We highlight the contradiction between the goals of these partnerships in international agricultural development, which seek to shift power dynamics and counter market exclusion, and the internal logic of these hybrid governance approaches, which reflect the tensions of market society from which they come. We present case studies from Honduras, Peru, and Mali of agricultural public-private and public-philanthropic partnerships and their constituent actors, identifying roles and relationships among actors that personify double movement negotiations within pro-poor market-oriented development. The cases highlight the implications for civil society actors of hybrid governance systems that utilize market mechanisms to address the destructive tendencies of capitalist development. We conclude that partnerships characterized by a mismatch of responsibilities and power relations among civil society and private actors generate a new type of double movement that does not generate durable institutions and that limits the impacts of the partnerships for poor farmers.
Double Movement in Hybrid Governance: Contestations in Market-oriented Agricultural Development
- Views Icon Views
- Share Icon Share
- Search Site
Kristal Jones, Daniel Tobin, J. Dara Bloom; Double Movement in Hybrid Governance: Contestations in Market-oriented Agricultural Development. Sociology of Development 1 June 2017; 3 (2): 95–115. doi: https://doi.org/10.1525/sod.2017.3.2.95
Download citation file: