The article demonstrates how the Constitution of Medina (622 ce) is a multidimensional rhetoric of justice that countered rampant violence in the nascent city-state known as Medina. To make this argument, the article first introduces this legal-political text and explicates the rhetorical exigence that mandated Medina's inhabitants to articulate a framework for rights and obligations. Second, the article demonstrates how the constitution unified this citizenry by (1) recognizing everyone's equal standing, equality, and rights—especially to religious freedom and justice—across their religious and tribal affiliations; and (2) establishing institutional measures that realize these rights. As rhetoric of possibility, the Constitution of Medina constituted a community and modeled rights discourse.
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
Summer 2018
Research Article|
August 01 2018
Legal-Political Rhetoric, Human Rights, and the Constitution of Medina*
Rasha Diab
Rasha Diab
Department of English University of California 1 Shields Avenue Davis, CA 95616 USA dpabbott@ucdavis.edu
Search for other works by this author on:
*
I thank Beth Godbee and two anonymous reviewers for their insightful feedback. Earlier drafts of this study were presented at the Rhetoric Society of America's (RSA) Biennial Institute and Conference. An earlier version constitutes part of chapter three of Shades of Ṣulḥḥ: The Rhetorics of Arab-Islamic Reconciliation.
Rhetorica (2018) 36 (3): 219–243.
Citation
Rasha Diab; Legal-Political Rhetoric, Human Rights, and the Constitution of Medina. Rhetorica 1 August 2018; 36 (3): 219–243. doi: https://doi.org/10.1525/rh.2018.36.3.219
Download citation file:
Sign in
Don't already have an account? Register
Client Account
You could not be signed in. Please check your email address / username and password and try again.
Could not validate captcha. Please try again.