This essay takes up a discussion concerning the 1929 debate between the philosophers Ernst Cassirer and Martin Heidegger by reading it as an instatiation of an ongoing dilemma within the field of rhetoric. I argue that the Davos meeting may be productively read through the lens of rhetorical theory and that such a reading can contribute to a more nuanced understanding of this event. The essay concludes by making a case for Cassirer's philosophy of symbolic forms as a normative ground for a rhetorical theory whose central purpose is to construct a decent, cultured, cosmopolitan, critical humanism.
Skip Nav Destination
Research Article| August 01 2014
Rhetoric's ghost at Davos: Reading Cassirer in the rhetorical tradition
Rhetorica (2014) 32 (3): 245–266.
- Views Icon Views
- Share Icon Share
- Search Site
Thomas A. Discenna; Rhetoric's ghost at Davos: Reading Cassirer in the rhetorical tradition. Rhetorica 1 August 2014; 32 (3): 245–266. doi: https://doi.org/10.1525/RH.2014.32.3.245
Download citation file: