As we publish the sixth volume of Resonance: The Journal of Sound and Culture we are delighted to share that four inspiring artists and scholars have joined the editorial board in 2025. It is with great pleasure that we welcome Rupert Cox, who currently works on the anthropology of sound while investigating questions about the politics of noise from perspectives of acoustic science, sound studies, and sound art, with a focus on projects in Japan. He teaches at the University of Manchester, UK. Also joining the journal is Lou Mallozzi, an interdisciplinary artist and educator in Chicago. He is on the faculty of the Department of Art + Technology / Sound Practices at the School of the Art Institute of Chicago. We also welcome Stephen Roddy, a musician, researcher, and lecturer working in computing and the arts at the Radical Humanities Lab and the Department of Digital Humanities at University College Cork, Ireland. Additionally, we welcome Louise K Wilson, a visual artist who makes installations, sound works, and videos. She is a lecturer in art and design at the University of Leeds, UK.

As a part of our greater scope, Resonance continues our dedication to publishing research on the history and archiving of radio. This issue features the launch of two special series that contribute to the formal affiliation between the journal and the Radio Preservation Task Force and the American Archive of Public Broadcasting, both of which are housed in the Library of Congress.

Lee Gilboa, a US-based Israeli composer/researcher, is a PhD candidate at Brown University and an assistant professor of electronic production and design at Berklee College of Music. In her contribution, “Against the Odds: Listening For Vocality and Heardness in Oral Testimonies,” Gilboa presents a new methodology for understanding oral testimonies with the goal of preserving the living voice in court records. The focus of her research is the recording of Central Park Five member Korey Wise and his coerced confession from 1989. Her research is a departure from the transcription methodologies and theories of performative utterances outlined by linguist J. L. Austin and now includes performative capacities relating to the act of speaking through Fred Moten’s writings on voice. The author also calls on Giorgio Agamben’s work on the witness and the testimony’s lacuna.

In her concluding remarks, the author reflects on the process of working directly with the Wise transcription and the application of Moten’s and Agamben’s theories to understand more from the testifying subject and those who listen:

In transcribing the confession, what came clear to me was that on its own, language itself was not enough to show the confrontation between the impossibility of reconstruction and the high stakes of the confession. In other words, transcribing vocality made clear that it is impossible to bear witness to the impossibilities and stakes of coerced confessions without accounting for the non-language of the voice. Bringing Moten and Agamben together has given me the space to materialize the idea of heardness in relation to coercion. Moten’s accompaniment gave room for the inflections, movements, speed, and pitch contour of the utterances. In doing so, it emphasized the sounding capacities of the voice. The lacuna has amplified the impossibility of bearing witness, and therefore the need to listen for what remains unsaid in the testimony. In the case of coercion, the unsaid is both the fact of coercion and the seeming inability to refuse it.

Josh Shepperd, one of Resonance’s associate editors, has co-developed a scholarly series on radio history with Amanda Keeler, both of whom are among the founding members of the Radio Preservation Task Force of the Library of Congress. We are excited to partner with them on “Sound History Is Cultural History,” a series with a diverse range of contributions from researchers with the Smithsonian, the Library of Congress, and the American Library Association, as well as sound artists and curators, all of whom are deeply engaged with cultural preservation.

In his study “Banging on the Door: Black People, Discrimination, and Broadcasting,” Bala James Baptiste outlines the federal government’s role in prohibiting station owners from discriminating against the employment of African Americans. The article also includes a close examination of the cultural climate of the 1960s that led to the creation of the Kerner Commission:

Kerner was the last of the pertinent federal initiatives of the modern civil rights era to acknowledge that Caucasian-centeredness and Black exclusion plagued mass media. Without enforcement power, it encouraged station owners to integrate racially. The commission served its purpose. The report publicized the findings, explained why the disturbances occurred, and proposed measures to alleviate the problems and avoid a repeat of the violent Black discontent.

Deborah Jaramillo’s contribution, “Bury Him by Radio: Early Funeral Broadcasts and the Mourning of President Warren G. Harding,” presents research on urban radio stations’ responses to Harding’s sudden death in 1923 as well as a chronicling of how death rituals and mourning practices were produced during a formative time in the development of radio:

Radio transmitted the sounds of grief to listeners still navigating the contours of broadcasting. The transmission of this liminal death ritual—the eulogy—signaled the coming together of personal expressions of grief, often delivered by politically powerful men, and an unseen audience of citizens invested in the loss of their president. Well before President Roosevelt’s fireside chats, which Jason Loviglio shows “conflated radio listening with national identity,” Harding’s mourning period collapsed the distinction between public and private.

Also appearing in the series is “Retailing Radio: The Industrial Afterlife of Classic Radio Recordings,” Eleanor Patterson’s account of how radio broadcasts were reconfigured as physical commodities and through subscription services like SiriusXM:

The term “aftermarket” suggests the commercial sale of goods that have outlived their original purpose. Classic radio programs will always bear the markings of their original production and distribution through the flow of commercial radio broadcasting in the sounds, sponsorship spots, references, and other sonic elements within the recordings. However, the formation of a commercial aftermarket for these programs demonstrates how the history of OTR radio recordings as commodities redefines our understanding of classic radio. Like the thrift shop or reclaimed lumber yard, the practices of Radio Yesteryear, Metacom, and Radio Spirits in selling radio recordings as objects that were remastered, duplicated, and packaged for retail transformed classic radio into a commercially viable commodity long after this content had been discarded by the mainstream media industries.

This issue includes the first installment of a new special series on the American actor, author, musician, and political satirist Harry Shearer. “Listening to Harry Shearer’s Le Show” is guest edited by Rosa Eberly, a rhetorician and faculty member in the Department of Communication Arts & Sciences at Penn State University. In her essay, “Harry Shearer’s Le Show: Sonic Hyperlinks of Public Memory,” Eberly outlines her focus on Shearer’s unique, 40-plus-year career as host of Le Show and the journey that led to the creation of the Le Show archive at the American Archive of Public Broadcasting.

In coining the term sonic hyperlinks (after John Slatin’s hyperlink) Eberly maps Shearer’s range of talents as a voice performer, his use of samples and excerpts from media sources and music, and his scripted interventions into public memory through the creation of sharply directed satire that, when combined into a Le Show program, allow for a deeply nuanced listening experience. Eberly shares,

In the early decades of Le Show, Shearer regularly created satiric segments called “Alternative Scenario Playhouse,” dramatized flights of fancy in which Shearer voiced and painstakingly produced his imagined versions of what happened behind the scenes of historical events. While there has not been a segment with that title for nearly a decade, Shearer’s imagined satires of the private interactions among public figures and their families and associates spans presidential administrations from Nixon to Trump. While presidential administrations are unlikely to be forgotten at least in broad strokes, more likely to slip into the memory hole are facets of US history that were poorly covered by journalists when they happened or that the American people would prefer to forget—or, in the cases of the last few examples in this essay—both.

Communication studies professor Joshua Gunn’s contribution, “Harry’s Dead Air,” is an analysis of the pauses and silences Shearer deploys in Le Show. Gunn’s research re-tasks notions of commercially unappealing dead air intervals into a new space for expression and interpretation. He adds,

I underscore, however, that Shearer’s pauses are sometimes so long one wonders if he accidentally went off the air. This dead air is first and foremost the signature of refusal to the neoliberal broadcasting game; every second does not need to be filled with wall-to-wall sound and speech. But it’s also an invitation for reflection, of a breath-taking “outside of the vox,” giving listeners time to process what he is saying, giving him some to actively think aloud and laugh. It is in this apposition of dead air and radio silence, so signified by an almost staccato series of pauses, that we hear the struggle of hegemony.

Writing & rhetoric studies scholar Jonathan Stone’s “The Folkness of Harry Shearer” is an analysis of Le Show as folklore. Stone details the embedded cultural and political ideals and morals that combine to make Le Show culturally significant:

As a producer and curator of folkness, Shearer’s work—ranging from his voice acting on The Simpsons to his collaborative projects with Christopher Guest and Michael McKean in This Is Spinal Tap and A Mighty Wind—resonates deeply by highlighting societal contradictions and inviting audiences to navigate these complexities with humor, effectively making them co-participants in the satire. Shearer is, thus, not just a master jokesmith, but a creator of mediated moral ecosystems that are inherently participatory. Audiences don’t just get the jokes; they use them, navigationally, to help make sense of the world.