This essay discusses the troubled relationships, both intellectual and intimate, of nineteenth-century essayist Thomas Carlyle to understand why Ralph Waldo Emerson and other contemporaries decide to forgive him, while despising his ideas. Coming to terms with the intensity of their affection was also to admit that their forgiveness was inappropriate to their principles and beliefs. Thinking through forgiveness as a kind of convexity, or dispersal of focus, the essay asks what it means to object, but love anyway, and what the challenge of forgiving Carlyle says about the logic, and the relevance, of their judgments.
Why Forgive Carlyle?
Elisa Tamarkin is Associate Professor of English at the University of California, Berkeley, and author of Anglophilia: Deference, Devotion, and Antebellum America (Chicago, 2008). She is completing a book on ideas of relevance and irrelevance since 1800.
- Views Icon Views
- Share Icon Share
- Search Site
Elisa Tamarkin; Why Forgive Carlyle?. Representations 1 May 2016; 134 (1): 64–92. doi: https://doi.org/10.1525/rep.2016.134.1.64
Download citation file: