Skip Nav Destination
Close Modal
Update search
Filter
- Title
- Author
- Author Affiliations
- Full Text
- Abstract
- Keyword
- DOI
- ISBN
- EISBN
- ISSN
- EISSN
- Issue
- Volume
- References
Filter
- Title
- Author
- Author Affiliations
- Full Text
- Abstract
- Keyword
- DOI
- ISBN
- EISBN
- ISSN
- EISSN
- Issue
- Volume
- References
Filter
- Title
- Author
- Author Affiliations
- Full Text
- Abstract
- Keyword
- DOI
- ISBN
- EISBN
- ISSN
- EISSN
- Issue
- Volume
- References
Filter
- Title
- Author
- Author Affiliations
- Full Text
- Abstract
- Keyword
- DOI
- ISBN
- EISBN
- ISSN
- EISSN
- Issue
- Volume
- References
Filter
- Title
- Author
- Author Affiliations
- Full Text
- Abstract
- Keyword
- DOI
- ISBN
- EISBN
- ISSN
- EISSN
- Issue
- Volume
- References
Filter
- Title
- Author
- Author Affiliations
- Full Text
- Abstract
- Keyword
- DOI
- ISBN
- EISBN
- ISSN
- EISSN
- Issue
- Volume
- References
NARROW
Format
Journal
Article Type
Date
Availability
1-9 of 9
James I. Matray
Close
Follow your search
Access your saved searches in your account
Would you like to receive an alert when new items match your search?
Sort by
Journal Articles
Pacific Historical Review (2018) 87 (2): 390–391.
Published: 01 May 2018
Journal Articles
Pacific Historical Review (2014) 83 (1): 176–178.
Published: 01 February 2014
Journal Articles
Pacific Historical Review (2012) 81 (2): 221–244.
Published: 01 May 2012
Abstract
This article reexamines negotiations to end the Korean War starting on July 10, 1951, and continuing through late November. It presents a new explanation for why reaching an agreement required two years. U.S. leaders publicly had endorsed a demarcation line at the 38th parallel, but the initial U.S. proposal provided for a demilitarized zone extending deep into North Korea. Gen. Matthew B. Ridgway, commander of the United Nations Command, was responsible for delivering this mixed message and sought to humiliate the Communists, demonstrate his personal toughness, and placate South Korea. In response, the Communist side became hostile and inflexible. POW repatriation became the main issue delaying peace, but Ridgway's proposal established a pattern of mistrust and acrimony prolonging a war that otherwise would have ended months before July 1953.
Journal Articles
Pacific Historical Review (2000) 69 (2): 304–306.
Published: 01 May 2000
Journal Articles
Pacific Historical Review (1996) 65 (1): 167–168.
Published: 01 February 1996
Journal Articles
Pacific Historical Review (1987) 56 (3): 474–475.
Published: 01 August 1987
Journal Articles
Pacific Historical Review (1985) 54 (2): 232–234.
Published: 01 May 1985
Journal Articles
Pacific Historical Review (1983) 52 (2): 242–244.
Published: 01 May 1983
Journal Articles
Pacific Historical Review (1981) 50 (2): 145–168.
Published: 01 May 1981