Focusing on the World War I era, this article examines Harry Chandler’s Los Angeles Times and William Randolph Hearst’s Los Angeles Examiner. It argues that these two rival newspapers urged a particular urban identity for Los Angeles during World War I. If Los Angeles was to become the capital of the American West, the papers demanded that real and rhetorical barriers be constructed to protect the city from a dual Japanese-Mexican menace. While federal officials viewed the border as a line to be maintained, Chandler and Hearst feared it. Los Angeles needed to be a borderlands fortress. After the war, the two newspapers ably transitioned into an editorial style that privileged progress over preparedness. This paper reveals that the contested narrative of progress, based in transnational concerns, was crucial to the city’s early and ultimate development.
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
Research Article|
May 01 2017
Borderlands Fortress: Newspaper Magnates, Preparedness, and the Rhetoric of Progress in World War I–Era Los Angeles
Maxwell Johnson
Maxwell Johnson
Maxwell Johnson is a doctoral candidate in U.S. history at Indiana University. His dissertation focuses on how Los Angeles city leaders viewed and utilized the city’s borderlands location from 1890 to 1945.
Search for other works by this author on:
Pacific Historical Review (2017) 86 (2): 258–289.
Citation
Maxwell Johnson; Borderlands Fortress: Newspaper Magnates, Preparedness, and the Rhetoric of Progress in World War I–Era Los Angeles. Pacific Historical Review 1 May 2017; 86 (2): 258–289. doi: https://doi.org/10.1525/phr.2017.86.2.258
Download citation file:
Sign in
Don't already have an account? Register
Client Account
You could not be signed in. Please check your email address / username and password and try again.
Could not validate captcha. Please try again.