In the 1950s, the Bureau of Indian Affairs (BIA) managed the Navajo Reservation's feral dog population by scheduling semi-annual “dog shoots.” After one gruesome dog shoot resulted in seventeen slaughtered dogs in Chinle, Arizona, community members pressed local BIA authorities to reform reservation dog control, an effort that pitted the interethnic community against an authoritarian form of settler-colonial governance. Because citizenship on the reservation—for Navajo and non-Navajo alike—was effectively rendered inferior to that of citizens outside the reservation, substantive changes to local BIA policies required an alliance with a constituency beyond the reservation’s borders, one with full access to state power—in this case, the National Dog Welfare Guild. This article thus demonstrates Native American grass-roots activism and boundary politics against oppressive federal authority.
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
February 2014
Research Article|
February 01 2014
The Chinle Dog Shoots: Federal Governance and Grass-roots Politics in Postwar Navajo Country
Khalil Anthony Johnson, Jr.
Khalil Anthony Johnson, Jr.
The author is a doctoral candidate at Yale University.
Search for other works by this author on:
Pacific Historical Review (2014) 83 (1): 92–129.
Citation
Khalil Anthony Johnson; The Chinle Dog Shoots: Federal Governance and Grass-roots Politics in Postwar Navajo Country. Pacific Historical Review 1 February 2014; 83 (1): 92–129. doi: https://doi.org/10.1525/phr.2014.83.1.92
Download citation file:
Sign in
Don't already have an account? Register
Client Account
You could not be signed in. Please check your email address / username and password and try again.
Could not validate captcha. Please try again.