Over four years after oil companies first applied for a permit, Congress authorized the Alaska Oil Pipeline in November 1973. Running from the Arctic Ocean to the Pacific,the pipeline crossed 600 miles of federal land, which made it a "major action significantly affecting the environment," thus triggering an environmental impact statement under the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA). Standard accounts tell of revolutionary environmental laws running into the economic reality of the 1970s. What has been lost in the telling is that the pipeline approval offered Congress an opportunity to investigate the wisdom of a proposed internal improvement. The pipeline controversy was not just the first battle of the environmental decade. It also continued nearly two centuries of debate over internal improvements, public financing of private investments, federal incorporation, monopoly charters, and national security. The pipeline approval was as much a decision about political economy as it was an environmental policy decision.
Skip Nav Destination
Close
Article navigation
August 2006
Research Article|
August 01 2006
The Alaska Pipeline as an Internal Improvement, 1969-1973
JOSHUA ASHENMILLER
JOSHUA ASHENMILLER
The author is a member of the history department at Fullerton College.
Search for other works by this author on:
Pacific Historical Review (2006) 75 (3): 461–490.
Citation
JOSHUA ASHENMILLER; The Alaska Pipeline as an Internal Improvement, 1969-1973. Pacific Historical Review 1 August 2006; 75 (3): 461–490. doi: https://doi.org/10.1525/phr.2006.75.3.461
Download citation file:
Close
Sign in
Don't already have an account? Register
Client Account
You could not be signed in. Please check your email address / username and password and try again.