This article critically examines recent legislation in South Africa intended to systematically overhaul the country's juvenile justice system. Developed and heatedly debated over the course of a decade, the Child Justice Act implements novel procedural protections and large-scale restorative justice programs. By analyzing the political history, social context, and evolving text of the Child Justice Act, I call into question prevailing assumptions about post-apartheid South Africa's socio-legal history. Close examination of the Act's major drafts (in 2002, 2007, and 2008) reveals a set of tensions in the political and rhetorical status of youths as alternately victims of circumstance and threats to society. Rather than confronting and resolving this tension, which subverts the linear logic of post-apartheid “transition,” the act reinscribes that tension in a new vocabulary and logic of governance and social management. Contemporary South African history thus demonstrates a pattern not of transition but of problematic permutations.
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
Research Article|
January 01 2012
Children of the Abyss: Permutations of Childhood in South Africa's Child Justice Act
*I would like to thank Janet Halley, Martha Minow, Paulo Carozza, Julia Sloth-Nielsen, and Jeanne-Marie Jackson for their invaluable advice and feedback. Thanks also to Akiba Covitz and the Office of Academic Affairs at Harvard Law School for funding that made this project possible.
New Criminal Law Review (2012) 15 (1): 68–121.
Citation
James Maguire; Children of the Abyss: Permutations of Childhood in South Africa's Child Justice Act. New Criminal Law Review 1 January 2012; 15 (1): 68–121. doi: https://doi.org/10.1525/nclr.2012.15.1.68
Download citation file: