This article examines how mitigation discourse fails to address the racial implications of presenting to white jurors a narrative of a black capital defendant's dysfunctional family life. Given the plethora of racist configurations in the public sphere of "the black family"—signified most perniciously through the figure of the "welfare queen"—the telling of a black defendant's dysfunctional family life may in fact reinforce what white jurors "already know" about black families. Indeed, since "the black family" figures not as an object of sympathy but of contempt, presenting uncritically mitigating evidence of a black capital defendant's family story may, in the end, provide to a white-dominated capital jury an opportunity to punish not only the black defendant but also "the black family" writ large.
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
Research Article|
April 01 2009
"Hang Them if They Have to be Hung": Mitigation Discourse, Black Families, and Racial Stereotypes
New Criminal Law Review (2009) 12 (2): 171–204.
Citation
Alycee Lane; "Hang Them if They Have to be Hung": Mitigation Discourse, Black Families, and Racial Stereotypes. New Criminal Law Review 1 April 2009; 12 (2): 171–204. doi: https://doi.org/10.1525/nclr.2009.12.2.171
Download citation file: