The "reasonable person" plays an important role in English and American criminal law, but not in German criminal law. The comparative view yields a number of differences (for example, with respect to negligent crimes, errors about justifying circumstances, and excuses like duress). Besides analyzing such differences, the article examines the legitimate role of social expectations in criminal law (which stand behind references to the "reasonable person") beyond the details of different legal systems. It concludes that one must distinguish judgments about wrongdoing from judgments about personal responsibility. The former are shaped by social expectations, while personal responsibility needs to be evaluated with a view to the individual offender.
Research Article| January 01 2008
Social Expectations in the Criminal Law: The "Reasonable Person" in a Comparative Perspective
New Criminal Law Review (2008) 11 (1): 1–32.
- Views Icon Views
- PDF LinkPDF
- Share Icon Share
- Search Site
Tatjana Höörnle; Social Expectations in the Criminal Law: The "Reasonable Person" in a Comparative Perspective. New Criminal Law Review 1 January 2008; 11 (1): 1–32. doi: https://doi.org/10.1525/nclr.2008.11.1.1
Download citation file: