The article examines whether force against a hijacked airplane is permissible if uninvolved passengers are killed. It takes a recent ruling by the German Federal Constitutional Court as its starting point, but addresses the relevant issues on a more general level with arguments drawn from moral philosophy, criminal law theory and constitutional theory, and political philosophy. The author concludes that a private individual who applies deadly force against the plane would commit a criminal wrong but should be excused. If, however, state officials act to protect the lives of other citizens, protective rights stand against defensive rights. Because such conflicts cannot be resolved within a discourse about rights, it is legitimate to save the greater number of persons.
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
Research Article|
November 01 2007
Hijacked Airplanes: May They Be Shot Down?
Tatjana Hörnle
Tatjana Hörnle
Ruhr-Universität Bochum, Germany
Search for other works by this author on:
New Criminal Law Review (2007) 10 (4): 582–612.
Citation
Tatjana Hörnle; Hijacked Airplanes: May They Be Shot Down?. New Criminal Law Review 1 November 2007; 10 (4): 582–612. doi: https://doi.org/10.1525/nclr.2007.10.4.582
Download citation file: