Although in recent years it has become a bit easier to discuss mental health challenges in public, mental illness is still somehow viewed by many in the public as a moral failing. It is that underlying judgement, that unwillingness to look at the many sources that leads to profound misunderstandings by the public, particularly in the context of a criminal trial. In this article I examine these issues in that context in order to better identify, and come to a better understanding of where our shared biases get in the way of a reasoned view of such evidence. The article examines some broad policy questions regarding what we, as a society, do with our mentally ill, and then looks at public perceptions and their impact on criminal justice decision making.
Research Article|
May 01 2018
The Blame Game: Public Antipathy to Mental Health Evidence in Criminal Trials
Andrea D. Lyon
Andrea D. Lyon
Andrea D. Lyon is Dean and Professor of Law at the Valparaiso University School of Law.
Search for other works by this author on:
New Criminal Law Review (2018) 21 (2): 247–266.
Citation
Andrea D. Lyon; The Blame Game: Public Antipathy to Mental Health Evidence in Criminal Trials. New Criminal Law Review 1 May 2018; 21 (2): 247–266. doi: https://doi.org/10.1525/nclr.2018.21.2.247
Download citation file: