Although in recent years it has become a bit easier to discuss mental health challenges in public, mental illness is still somehow viewed by many in the public as a moral failing. It is that underlying judgement, that unwillingness to look at the many sources that leads to profound misunderstandings by the public, particularly in the context of a criminal trial. In this article I examine these issues in that context in order to better identify, and come to a better understanding of where our shared biases get in the way of a reasoned view of such evidence. The article examines some broad policy questions regarding what we, as a society, do with our mentally ill, and then looks at public perceptions and their impact on criminal justice decision making.
Skip Nav Destination
Research Article| May 01 2018
The Blame Game: Public Antipathy to Mental Health Evidence in Criminal Trials
New Criminal Law Review (2018) 21 (2): 247–266.
- Views Icon Views
- Share Icon Share
- Search Site
Andrea D. Lyon; The Blame Game: Public Antipathy to Mental Health Evidence in Criminal Trials. New Criminal Law Review 1 May 2018; 21 (2): 247–266. doi: https://doi.org/10.1525/nclr.2018.21.2.247
Download citation file: