1-20 of 268 Search Results for

tapping

Follow your search
Access your saved searches in your account

Would you like to receive an alert when new items match your search?
Close Modal
Sort by
Journal Articles
Music Perception (2012) 29 (4): 449–450.
Published: 01 April 2012
...). On the other hand, when IOI was removed from the ITI model the R-square values decreased by 0.40 (R-squared change in Table 2d-1, p. 74). Accordingly, as discussed in our paper, the results indicated that the overall impact of ITI is much smaller than that of IOI on tapping vari- ability, and that...
Journal Articles
Music Perception (2012) 29 (4): 447–448.
Published: 01 April 2012
..., paragraph 2, line 8, ZRF refer to Tap-click asynchrony but mean Tap-click ratio. Later they describe their own findings thus: In the ITI-based analysis, as shown in Figure 3d, the 1:2, 1:3, and 1:4 regression lines crossed the 1:1 regression line around 200 ms (p. 75). Although it is difficult to see...
Journal Articles
Music Perception (2011) 29 (1): 65–78.
Published: 01 September 2011
...Benjamin Rich Zendel; Bernhard Ross; Takako Fujioka when finger taps are synchronized with an isochronous click, it is known that tap-click asynchrony and its variability increase with the interonset interval (IOI). It remains unclear whether these results are due to the IOI or the intertap...
Journal Articles
Music Perception (2018) 36 (1): 1–23.
Published: 01 September 2018
... of both generic constraints and selected cultural particularities in shaping rhythmic prototypes. We experimentally tested musicians’ synchronization (finger tapping) with simple periodic rhythms at two different tempi with participants in Mali, Bulgaria, and Germany. We found support both for the...
Includes: Supplementary data
Images
Circular histogram of participants’ <b>tapping</b> according to Listening Conditio...
Published: 11 March 2020
Figure 4. Circular histogram of participants’ tapping according to Listening Condition. The size of the bins represent the total number of taps, 0° represents the beat. More
Images
Significant interactions in <b>tapping</b> performance for (A) circular variance (...
Published: 11 March 2020
Figure 5. Significant interactions in tapping performance for (A) circular variance (B) and asynchrony. Error bars indicate 95% confidence intervals. More
Images
Effects of syncopation on finger-<b>tapping</b> synchronization, measured as MRL (...
Published: 11 March 2020
Figure 2. Effects of syncopation on finger-tapping synchronization, measured as MRL (mean resultant length), plotted as raw (not transformed) data. Left panel: Effect of the syncopation’s metric location; Right panel: the number of instrumental streams interacting with group. More
Images
Effects of syncopation on finger-<b>tapping</b> synchronization, measured as phase...
Published: 11 March 2020
Figure 3. Effects of syncopation on finger-tapping synchronization, measured as phase angle (in radians), plotted as raw (not transformed) data. Left panel: Effect of the syncopation’s metric location; Right panel: the number of instrumental streams in the pattern. More
Images
Exclusion criteria for finger <b>tapping</b>: A) exclude first eight <b>taps</b> in each ...
Published: 01 December 2019
FIGURE 2. Exclusion criteria for finger tapping: A) exclude first eight taps in each series, B) identify and exclude mistakes (i.e., double or missing taps). Series with more than six mistakes were excluded prior to the analyses. FIGURE 2. Exclusion criteria for finger tapping: A) exclude first More
Images
<b>Tapping</b> stability (SD offset in ms) as a function of Microtiming asynchrony...
Published: 01 December 2019
FIGURE 5. Tapping stability (SD offset in ms) as a function of Microtiming asynchrony between bass and drums split by Musicianship. Error bars: ±1 standard errors. FIGURE 5. Tapping stability (SD offset in ms) as a function of Microtiming asynchrony between bass and drums split by Musicianship More
Journal Articles
Music Perception (2007) 24 (4): 367–376.
Published: 01 April 2007
...Bruno H. Repp; Rebecca Doggett WHEN NONMUSICIANS TAP with isochronous auditory tone sequences, the taps typically precede the tone onsets. However, when the tone inter-onset interval (IOI) is increased beyond 2 s, an increasing proportion of taps follows the tone onsets by 150 ms or more. Such...
Journal Articles
Music Perception (2006) 24 (2): 135–146.
Published: 01 December 2006
...Joel S. Snyder; Erin E. Hannon; Edward W. Large; Morten H. Christiansen The goal of this study was to assess the ability of North American adults to synchronize and continue their tapping to complex meter patterns in the presence and absence of musical cues to meter.We asked participants to tap to...
Journal Articles
Music Perception (2005) 23 (2): 165–188.
Published: 01 December 2005
...Bruno H. Repp THE RELATIVE DIFFICULTY of on-beat and off-beat finger tapping with simple auditory rhythms was assessed in four experiments with musically trained participants. The rhythms consisted of cyclically repeated TT0 or TTT0 patterns, where T denotes the presence and 0 denotes the absence...
Journal Articles
Music Perception (2005) 22 (3): 479–496.
Published: 01 March 2005
...Bruno H. Repp The accuracy of on-beat and off-beat synchronized finger tapping was examined as a function of sequence rate in musically trained individuals. Auditory sequences consisted of cyclically repeated, underlyingly isochronous patterns of the form T0, TT0, or TTT0, where T denotes a tone...
Journal Articles
Music Perception (2003) 21 (1): 43–80.
Published: 01 September 2003
... amount of syncopation, and the metrical position of the first note. We quantified the period and phase of tapping, the amount of nonsynchronized tapping, the time to start tapping, the variability of the intertap interval, and the deviation of taps from the intended musical events. The amount of musical...
Journal Articles
Music Perception (2001) 18 (4): 455–489.
Published: 01 June 2001
...Joel Snyder; Carol L. Krumhansl Two experiments investigated cues to pulse finding using a relatively unconstrained, naturalistic paradigm. Participants tapped what they felt was a comfortable pulse on a keyboard playing a percussive sound. The stimulus materials were based on ragtime excerpts...
Journal Articles
Music Perception (2020) 37 (4): 263–277.
Published: 11 March 2020
...Figure 4. Circular histogram of participants’ tapping according to Listening Condition. The size of the bins represent the total number of taps, 0° represents the beat. ...
Journal Articles
Music Perception (2000) 18 (1): 1–23.
Published: 01 October 2000
.... Musicians and nonmusicians tapped on a drum in synchrony with six musical excerpts, each presented in three versions: mechanical (synthesized from the score, without microstructure), accented (mechanical, with intensity accents), and expressive (performed by a concert pianist, with all types of...
Journal Articles
Music Perception (2019) 37 (2): 111–133.
Published: 01 December 2019
...FIGURE 2. Exclusion criteria for finger tapping: A) exclude first eight taps in each series, B) identify and exclude mistakes (i.e., double or missing taps). Series with more than six mistakes were excluded prior to the analyses. FIGURE 2. Exclusion criteria for finger tapping: A) exclude first...
Images
A binary logistic regression analysis comparing the absolute <b>tap</b> asynchroni...
Published: 01 February 2020
Figure 4. A binary logistic regression analysis comparing the absolute tap asynchronies from the expected onset of the probe tone to the response accuracy on a trial-by-trial basis for both pianists and non-pianists. Figure 4. A binary logistic regression analysis comparing the absolute tap More