Figure 1. Notated examples of non-altered and altered rhythm perception trials with 4/4- and 3/4-time signatures. Note : Notated examples of non-altered and altered rhythm perception trials with 4/4- and 3/4-time signatures. The trials were built on a call- and-response structure, the first four ... More about this image found in Notated examples of non-altered and altered rhythm perception trials with 4...

Figure 2. Pearson correlation heatmap displaying the associations present in the analyzed sample. Note: Pearson correlation heatmap displaying the associations present in the analysed sample. Shade of blue representing the strength of positive correlation between variables entered. * p < .05, ... More about this image found in Pearson correlation heatmap displaying the associations present in the anal...

Figure 3. Scatter plots illustrating the main outcome of the linear regression. Note: Scatter plots illustrating the main outcome of the linear regression performed with Word Text Reading Fluency ∼ Rhythm Perception Performance + Digit Span Forward RP + Digit Span Backward RP + BMRQ-SM + Family Ri... More about this image found in Scatter plots illustrating the main outcome of the linear regression. Note:...

Figure 4. Illustration of the detected indirect path between rhythm and reading. Note: Mediation analysis indicating the influence of verbal short-term memory skill on the relationship between rhythm perception and reading fluency within the FR group (A). No significant indirect effect is given in... More about this image found in Illustration of the detected indirect path between rhythm and reading. Note...

Figure 5. Boxplots displaying the difference in rhythm perception between the family risk and control group (5A) and reading comprehension groups (5B). Note : Boxplots displaying the weak difference between family risk and control group in the rhythm perception task (A), as well as the weak diffe... More about this image found in Boxplots displaying the difference in rhythm perception between the family ...

Figure 1. ( A ): Hand-made device with a clamp holding the paper strip containing the aroma. ( B ): Demonstration of the use of this device (note that this photo is not of an actual participant). More about this image found in ( A ): Hand-made device with a clamp holding the paper strip containing the...

Figure 2. Loading plots derived from the unfolded matrix-2 (280 observations x 14 musical parameters); ( A ): p[3] vs. p[1]; ( B ): p[4] vs. p[2]. More about this image found in Loading plots derived from the unfolded matrix-2 (280 observations x 14 mus...

Figure 3. Scatterplots with fitted regression line showing the positive correlation between four variables from the pitch dimension (unfolded matrix-2); ( A ): N mode vs. N mean ; ( B ): N min vs. N mean ; ( C ): N max vs. N mean . In all 3 figures, the values corresponding to piani... More about this image found in Scatterplots with fitted regression line showing the positive correlation b...

Figure 4. PCA results using the 5 pitch-related parameters (unfolded matrix-1); ( A ): score plot (t[2] vs. t[1]) considering the 14 pianists (14 x 5 = 70 variables); ( B ): Horizontal axis: t[1] scores from a PCA fitted with 8 pianists (consensus subgroup): P02, P05, P06, P07, P10, P11, P12, and ... More about this image found in PCA results using the 5 pitch-related parameters (unfolded matrix-1); ( A )...

Figure 5. Scatterplot of fitted regression model between odor pleasantness of the 20 stimuli vs. three musical features (average values from the 14 pianists) extracted from the improvisations; ( A ): pitch-class entropy; ( B ): dissonance; ( C ): minimum note. More about this image found in Scatterplot of fitted regression model between odor pleasantness of the 20 ...

Figure 1. DMI mobile apps ensemble formed by primary school students. More about this image found in DMI mobile apps ensemble formed by primary school students.

Figure 2. DMI mobile apps ensemble featuring acoustic musical instrument. More about this image found in DMI mobile apps ensemble featuring acoustic musical instrument.

Figure 3. Scatterplot showing the relationship between participants’ mean rating scores of expectedness and evaluation constructs. More about this image found in Scatterplot showing the relationship between participants’ mean rating scor...

Figure 1. Simulation experiment results for accuracy vs. similarity measures. More about this image found in Simulation experiment results for accuracy vs. similarity measures.

Figure 2. Development of average attempt length across attempt. More about this image found in Development of average attempt length across attempt.

Figure 3. Mean similarity values as a function of attempt. More about this image found in Mean similarity values as a function of attempt.