In the tritone paradox, two tones are presented that are related by a halfoctave. Each tone consists of a set of octave-related sinusoids whose amplitudes are scaled by a bell-shaped spectral envelope; thus the usual cues to height attribution are missing. When listeners judge whether such tone pairs form ascending or descending patterns, judgments are related in an orderly fashion to the positions of the tones along the pitch class circle: Tones in one region of the circle are heard as higher and those in the opposite region as lower. However, listeners differ strikingly in the orientation of the pitch-class circle with respect to height. So far, the basis of the tritone paradox and the reasons for the individual differences in its manifestation have proved elusive. In the present study, a correlation is found between perception of the tritone paradox and the range of fundamental frequencies of the listener's speaking voice. To the authors' knowledge, this is the first demonstration of a close connection between the perception of a musical pattern on the one hand and the listener's speech characteristics on the other.

[Footnotes]

[Footnotes]
6
D. Deutsch, T. North, and L. Ray (1989).
Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, Suppl. 1 86, S17.

References

References
Babbitt, M. Twelve-tone invariants as compositional determinants. Musical Quarterly, 1960,46,246-259.
Babbitt, M. The structure and function of music theory. College Music Symposium, 1965, 5, 10-21.
Bachem, A. Note on Neu s review of the literature on absolute pitch. Psychological Bulletin, 1948, 45, 161-162.
Charbonneau, G. & Risset, J. C. Circularité de jugements de hauteur sonore. Comptes Ren- dus de L'Academie des Sciences, Ser. B., 1973, 277, 623.
Demany, L. & Armand, F. The perceptual reality of tone chroma in early infancy. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1984, 76,57-66.
Deutsch, D. Music recognition. Psychological Review, 1969, 76, 300-307.
Deutsch, D. Octave generalization or specific interference effects in memory for tonal pitch. Perception and Psychophysics, 1973, 13, 271-275.
Deutsch, D. The processing of pitch combinations. In D. Deutsch (Ed.), The psychology of music. New York: Academic Press, 1982, pp. 271-316.
Deutsch, D. A musical paradox. Music Perception, 1986, 3, 275-280.
Deutsch, D. The tritone paradox: Effects of spectral variables. Perception and Psychophy- sics, 1987,41,563-575.
Deutsch, D. The semitone paradox. Music Perception, 1988, 6, 115-132.
Deutsch, D. The tritone paradox in relation to patterns of relative loudness tor the compo- nents of the tones, (in preparation)
Deutsch, D., Kuyper, W. L., & Fisher, Y. The tritone paradox: Its presence and form of dis- tribution in a general population. Music Perception, 1987, 5, 79-92.
Deutsch, D., Moore, F. R., & Dolson, M. Pitch classes differ with respect to height. Music Perception, 1984, 2, 265-271.
Deutsch, D., Moore, F. R., & Dolson, M. The perceived height of octave-related complexes. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1986, 80, 1346-1353.
Meyer, M. On the attributes of the sensations. Psychological Review, 1904, 11, 83-103.
Nakajima, Y., Tsumura, T., Matsuura, S., Minami, H., & Teramshi, R. Dynamic pitch per- ception for complex tones derived from major triads. Music Perception, 1988, 6, 1-20.
Ohgushi, K. Circularity of the pitch of complex tones and its application. Electronic Com- munications of Japan, Part 1, 1985, 68, 1-10.
Rabiner, L. R. & Shafer, R. W. Digital processing of speech signals. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall, 1978.
Revesz, G. Zur grundlegun der Tonpsychologie. Leipzig: Feit, 1913.
Risset, J. C. Paradoxes de hauteur: Le concept de hauteur sonore n'est pas le même pour tout le monde. Proceedings of the Seventh International Congress of Acoustics, Budapest, 1971,p.20,S10.
Ruckmick, C. A. A new classification of tonal qualities. Psychological Review, 1929, 36, 172-180.
Shepard, R. N. Circularity in judgments of relative pitch. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1964, 36, 2345-2353.
Shepard, R. N. Approximation to uniform gradients of generalization by monotone trans- formations of scale. In D. I. Mostofsky (Ed.), Stimulus generalization. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1965.
Shepard, R. N. Structural representations of musical pitch. In D. Deutsch (Ed.), The psy- chology of music. New York: Academic Press, 1982, pp. 344-390.
Terhardt, E. Pitch, consonance, and harmony. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1974, 55, 1061-1069.
Terhardt, E. Music perception and sensory information acquisition: Relationships and low- level analogies. Music Perception (in press). Thurlow, W. R. Perception of low auditory pitch: A multicue mediation theory. Psychologi- cal Review, 1963, 70,515-519.
Ueda, K. & Ohgushi, K. Perceptual components of pitch: Spatial representation using a mul- tidimensional scaling technique. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1987, 82, 1193-1200.
Ward, W. D., & Burns, E. M. Absolute pitch. In D. Deutsch (Ed.), The psychology of music. New York: Academic Press, 1982, pp. 431-452.
Whitfield, I. C. The auditory pathway. London: Arnold. 1967.
Whitfield, I. C. Central nervous processing in relation to spatio-temporal discrimination of auditory patterns. In R. Plomp & G. F. Smoorenberg (Eds.), Frequency analysis and peri- odicity detection in hearing. Leiden: Sijthoff, 1970, pp. 136-146.
This content is only available via PDF.