A melodic process traces a melody's principal motions from its main beginning to its closure. Western tonal music seems built around a handful of different melodic processes. In each of three experiments, we took melodically complete excerpts from fully instrumented recordings of music of the Classical and Romantic periods. The stimuli instantiated either of two different melodic processes. The processes varied across experiments. Subjects judged the dissimilarity of pairs of stimuli. Multidimensional scaling and hierarchical clustering showed that melodic processes and overall properties of contour were important in determining the subjects' perceptions. In a fourth experiment, two-part forms proved perceptually distinguishable from three-part forms. A final experiment which systematically varied both process and form indicated that process and contour can completely mask any perceptual effects of form. On balance, melodic process, contour, and form influence the perception of music in descending order of importance.

References

References
Adams, C. R. Melodic contour typology. Ethnomusicology, 1976, 20, 179-215.
Apel, W. Harvard dictionary of music. Cambridge: Belknap Press, 1969.
Bent, I. D. Analysis, III, 4: Formal analysis. In S. Sadie (Ed.) The new Grove dictionary of music and musicians. Grove: London, 1980.
Crowder, R. G. Principles of learning and memory. Hillsdale: Erlbaum, 1976.
Deutsch, D. Octave generalization and tune recognition. Perception & Psychophysics, 1972,11,411-412.
Deutsch, D., & Feroe, J. The internal representation of pitch sequences in tonal music. Psy- chological Review, 1981, 88, 503-522.
Dowling, W. J. Recognition of inversions of melodies and melodic contours. Perception & Psychophysics, 1971, 9, 348-349.
Dowling, W. Recognition of melodic transformations: inversion, retrograde, and retro- grade inversion. Perception & Psychophysics, 1972, 12,417-421.
Dowling, W. J. Scale and contour: two components of a theory of memory for melodies. Psychological Review, 1978, 85, 341-354.
Dowling, W. J., & Fujitani, D. A. Contour, interval, and pitch recognition in memory for melodies. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1971, 49, 524-531.
Dowling, W. J., & Hollombe, A. W. The perception of melodies distorted by splitting into several octaves: effects of increasing proximity and melodic contour. Perception & Psy- chophysics, 1977, 21, 60-64.
Francès, R. La perception de la musique. Paris: Vrin, 1958.
Idson, W. L., & Massaro, D. W. A bidimensional model of pitch in the recognition of melo- dies. Perception & Psychophysics, 1978, 24, 551-565.
Johnson, S. C. Hierarchical clustering schemes. Psychometrika, 1967, 32, 241-254.
Krumhansl, C. L. The psychological representation of pitch in a tonal context. Cognitive Psychology, 1979, 11, 346-374.
Krumhansl, C. L., Bharucha, J. J., & Kessler, E. J. Perceived harmonic structure of chords in three related musical keys. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 1982, 8, 24-36.
Krumhansl, C. L., & Kessler, E. J. Tracing the dynamic changes in perceived organization in a spatial representation of musical keys. Psychological Review, 1982, 89, 334-368.
Lerdahl, F., & Jackendoff, R. A generative theory of tonal music. Cambridge: MIT Press, 1983.
Meyer, L. B. Explaining music: essays and explorations. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1973.
Rosner, B. S., & Meyer, L. B. Melodic processes and the perception of music. In D. Deutsch (Ed.), The psychology of music. New York: Academic Press, 1982.
Schenker, H. Neue musikalische Theorien und Phantasien: Der freie Satz. Vienna: Universal Edition, 1956.
Shepard, R. N. Analysis of proximities: multidimensional scaling with an unknown distance function. I. Psychometrika, 1962a, 27, 125-140.
Shepard, R. N. Analysis of proximities: multidimensional scaling with an unknown distance function. II. Psychometrika, 1962b, 27, 219-246.
Shepard, R. N. Structural representations of musical pitch. In D. Deutsch (Ed.), The psy- chology of music. New York: Academic Press, 1982.
Takane, Y., Young, F. W., & de Leeuw, J. Nonmetric individual differences scaling: An al- ternating least squares method with optimal scaling features. Psychometrika, 1977, 42, 7-67.
White, B. Recognition for distorted melodies. American Journal of Psychology, 1960, 73, 100-107.
Wishart, D. CLUSTAN user manual (3rd edition). Inter-University/Research Council Series Report 47, 1978.
Young, F. W. An asymmetric Euclidean model for multiprocess asymmetric data. Proceed- ings of the U. S.-Japan Seminar on Multidimensional Scaling, 1975, 79-88.
This content is only available via PDF.