The OPERA hypothesis theorizes how musical experience heightens perceptual acuity to lexical tones. One missing element in the hypothesis is whether musical advantage is general to all or specific to some lexical tones. To further extend the hypothesis, this study investigated whether English musicians consistently outperformed English nonmusicians in perceiving a variety of Cantonese tones. In an AXB discrimination task, the musicians exhibited superior discriminatory performance over the nonmusicians only in the high level, high rising, and mid-level tone contexts. Similarly, in a Cantonese tone sequence recall task, the musicians significantly outperformed the nonmusicians only in the contour tone context but not in the level tone context. Collectively, the results reflect the selectivity of musical advantage—musical experience is only advantageous to the perception of some but not all Cantonese tones, and elements of selectivity can be introduced to the OPERA hypothesis. Methodologically, the findings highlight the need to include a wide variety of lexical tone contrasts when studying music-to-language transfer.
Music training induces long-term psychological and cognitive benefits (Ho, Cheung, & Chan, 2003; Paquette & Goulet, 2014; Rodrigues, Loureiro, & Caramelli, 2010; Schellenberg & Mankarious, 2012; Stoesz, Jakobson, Kilgour, & Lewycky, 2007). In the language domain, one eminent advantage of music training is enhanced perceptual sensitivity to fundamental frequency-based phonological features (lexical tones, Burnham & Mattock, 2007; Gandour, 1981) (e.g., Alexander, Wong, & Bradlow, 2005; Delogu, Lampis, & Olivetti-Belardinelli, 2006; Kraus & Chandrasekaran, 2010; Patel, 2011). Given the limited number of lexical tones tested in previous studies, a question naturally arises as to whether musical advantage is general to all or specific to some lexical tones. To fill this important research gap and advance the theoretical understanding of music-to-language transfer, this study investigated whether musicians consistently exhibited perceptual advantage over nonmusicians across all Cantonese tone contexts.
The OPERA hypothesis posits that music training enhances the neural encoding of speech as long as five conditions (overlap, precision, emotion, repetition, and attention) are met (Patel, 2011). For example, in terms of precision, Patel argues that music must entail more fine-grained processing than speech for music-to-language transfer to occur. From the theoretical perspective, the OPERA hypothesis has offered a comprehensive account for a large body of studies that demonstrated superior lexical tone perception in musicians vis-à-vis nonmusicians. In an early study, Italian listeners who had high melodic ability were better at detecting tonal variations than those who had low melodic ability (Delogu et al., 2006). Musical advantage was also evident in AX and identification tasks—English-speaking musicians were more accurate than English-speaking nonmusicians in identifying and discriminating Mandarin tones (Alexander et al., 2005). Remarkably, the English-speaking musicians even performed on par with native listeners in Mandarin tone discrimination. This reflected that music training could boost non-native listeners’ tonal sensitivity to a native level. English-speaking musicians’ advantage in Mandarin tone perception was even identified at the phrase level (Zheng & Samuel, 2018). The central idea from the studies was that music training could enhance listeners’ ability to discriminate lexical tones in AX tasks, at least for speakers of nontonal languages (e.g., English and Italian).
Musical advantage was also identified at higher perceptual levels. In a Cantonese tone-word learning study, listeners were trained over seven sessions to identify words differing minimally by five Cantonese tones (Cooper & Wang, 2012). In the seventh training session, the English-speaking musicians identified tone-words more accurately than the English-speaking nonmusicians, even though both groups performed similarly in the first session. The results reflected that music training was not only beneficial to low level speech discrimination. Crucially, music training also brought about positive impacts in tasks that entailed higher level perceptual operations such as memory encoding and storage of lexical tones. This musical advantage emerged upon adequate tone-word learning experience.
Although musical advantage has been well studied, one important element is still missing in the literature: is musical advantage general to all or specific to some lexical tones? As described previously, the OPERA hypothesis has put forward five prerequisites for music-to-language transfer, but there is a lack of explicit specification of whether the perceptual benefits resulting from music-to-language transfer is “selective” to lexical tones (Patel, 2011). Apart from the lack of relevant analysis conducted, the available data in the literature could not adequately address this question given the small number of tones tested. For example, a previous study only tested the discrimination of level tones but not contour tones (Zhang & Samuel, 2018). Even in the studies that utilized all possible lexical tone pairs (e.g., Alexander et al., 2005), the number of tone contrasts was still limited given the small number of lexical tones in Mandarin (Gu & Lee, 2009).
With a rich tonal repertoire, Cantonese provides a fascinating window into the potential interaction between musical experience and lexical tones in lexical tone perception. According to Chao (1930), there are six lexical tones in Cantonese, namely high level (HL, 55), high rising (HR, 25), mid-level (ML, 33), low falling (LF, 21), low rising (LR, 23), and low level tones (LL, 22).1 Acoustically, HL, HR, and ML tones have higher average F0 (i.e, pitch height) than LL, LF. and LR tones (see Figure 1). In terms of the changes of overall F0 over time (i.e., F0 contour), HR, LF, and LR tones exhibit more drastic changes while HL, ML, and LL tones remain relatively steady. Linguistically, variations of lexical tones in a Cantonese syllable can result in multiple meanings, e.g., 優 /jau-HL/ distinction, 柚 /jau-HR/ grapefruit, 幼 /jau-ML/ thin, 油 /jau-LF/ oil, 有 /jau-LR/ have, 右 /jau-LL/ right. The rich tonal repertoire gives rise to a much larger set of lexical tone contrasts in Cantonese (15) than in Mandarin (6) (Choi, Tong, Gu, Tong, & Wong, 2017; Choi, Tong, & Singh, 2017; Gandour, 1981).
In this study, it is hypothesized that the musical advantage in Cantonese tone perception is selective. Drawing on parallels with congenital amusia, there is available evidence suggesting that amusical disadvantage in lexical tone perception is not purely general but instead dependent on specific lexical tone contrasts (e.g., Tillmann, Burnham, Nguyen, Grimault, Gosselin, & Peretz, 2011). In Tillmann and colleagues’ study, French congenital amusics were less accurate than French controls in discriminating all Thai tone contrasts. This seemed to indicate a blanket disadvantage in Thai tone discrimination. However, a fine-grained analysis further revealed a significant interaction between group and tone contrasts. Although the French congenital amusics performed consistently poorer than the French controls, the performance gap narrowed for the rising-and-falling tone contrast. This interaction suggested that the perceptual disadvantage was dependent on specific tone contrasts. A similar pattern was found among Mandarin congenital amusics; they identified Mandarin tones consistently poorer than the controls but the performance gap was wider for mid-rising tone (Nan, Sun, & Peretz, 2010). Collectively, studies on congenital amusics indicated that amusia exerted differential effects on different lexical tones, even though the congenital amusics performed poorer than the controls as a whole.
Further indirect evidence for the hypothesis could be drawn from cross-linguistic research. While some early studies reported that tonal listeners were better at non-native tone discrimination than nontonal listeners (e.g., Lee, Vakoch, & Wurm, 1996; Wayland & Guion, 2004), a recent study with a more nuanced analysis demonstrated a clear specificity: Thai listeners outperformed English listeners only in identifying two out of four Mandarin tones (Li, 2016). Paralleling the cases of congenital amusics (Nan et al., 2010; Tillmann et al., 2011), the interaction between group and lexical tone suggested that tone-language advantage was selective rather than general. Taken together, research on congenital amusia and cross-linguistic transfer indicated that the perceptual (dis)advantages associated with amusia/language experience were hardly general. Thus, it is reasonable to hypothesize that the musical advantage in lexical tone perception is selective.
To further extend the OPERA hypothesis and advance the theoretical understanding of music-to-language transfer, this study investigated whether the musical advantage in Cantonese tone perception was general or selective. Of particular interest to this study was whether English musicians consistently outperformed English nonmusicians across different Cantonese tone contexts. Given that musical advantage was evident in both low level discrimination and high level perceptual operations (Alexander et al., 2005; Cooper & Wang, 2012; Delogu et al., 2006; Zheng & Samuel, 2018), listeners were tested with both AXB discrimination and sequence recall tasks.
Forty English listeners were recruited from University College London and its surrounding areas. The participants were divided into two groups (i.e., musicians and nonmusicians), each with 20 participants. Adopting the same criteria from a previous study, the musicians were those who had received at least seven years of continuous music training and had the ability to play their instruments at the time of testing (Tong, Choi, & Man, 2018). The nonmusicians were those who (a) had received less than two years of music training, if any, throughout their life, (b) had not received any music training in the past five years and (c) could not play any musical instrument at the time of testing. One nonmusician did not show up for the experiment, and one nonmusician was excluded from the study for having received five years of music training. One musician was excluded from the study due to self-reported Mandarin learning experience. The final sample consisted of 19 musicians (5 males, 14 females) and 18 nonmusicians (8 males, 10 females).
The mean ages of the musicians and nonmusicians were 26.63 years (SD = 5.89 years) and 32.67 years (SD = 11.60 years) respectively. The mean onset age of music training was 7.84 years (SD = 2.89 years) for musicians and 12.00 years (SD = 4.86 years) for nonmusicians. On average, the musicians had received 11.63 years of music training (SD = 3.90 years) while the nonmusicians had only received 0.90 year of music training (SD = 1.56 year). According to self-reports, none of the participants possessed absolute pitch.
Cantonese tone discrimination task
Adopting an AXB paradigm, this task assessed the ability to discriminate Cantonese tones. The stimuli included all possible 15 pairs of Cantonese tone contrasts2 (i.e., HL-HR, HL-ML, HL-LF, HL-LR, HL-LL, HR-ML, HR-LF, HR-LR, HR-LL, ML-LF, ML-LR, ML-LL, LF-LR, LF-LL, LR-LL, embedded in different segments, e.g., /ka/, /ku/, /kε/, /ki/ and /kɔ/). All stimuli were naturally recorded by two native Cantonese speakers, one male and one female. On each trial, three syllables (e.g., /ka-HL/ /ka-ML/ /ka-ML/) were presented via Sennheiser HD280 PRO headphones, with an interstimulus interval of 600 ms. Participants then indicated, by pressing the associated keys, whether the first or the third syllable carried the same lexical tone as the second syllable did. To prevent the participants from relying on simple acoustic comparisons, AB and X were produced by speakers of different genders. There were eight trials for each Cantonese tone contrast and the total number of trials was 120. The task began with six practice trials with feedback provided. The sample-specific internal consistency was high (α = .81).
Sequence recall task
This task, which assessed the ability to represent and store Cantonese tones in memory, was modified from a stress sequence recall task (Dupoux, Peperkamp, & Sabastian-Galles, 2010). There were three contexts—a vowel context (/ta-HL/ /tε-HL/), a level tone context (/ta-HL/-/ta-ML/), and a contour tone context (/ta-LF/-/ta-LR/). All stimuli were recorded by the same native Cantonese speakers as above. In each context, the first nonword (e.g., /ta-LF/) was associated with the key  while the second nonword (e.g., /ta-LR/) was associated with the key .
In the familiarization phase, the participants listened to the items as many times as desired by pressing the keys  and . Following the familiarization phase, there were eight identification trials of  and  with feedback provided.
On each trial in the contour tone context, a sequence of syllables (e.g., /ta-LR/ /ta-LF/ /ta-LF/ /ta-LR/) with a varying length (2, 3, 4, 5, or 6) was presented. Following sequence presentation, participants reproduced the sequence by pressing the associated keys in the correct order (e.g., 2112 for /ta-LR/ /ta-LF/ /ta-LF/ /ta-LR/). They could also skip any trial by simply pressing enter. A response was marked as correct only if it was a 100% match of the sequence presented. Any other responses were marked as incorrect. One point was given for each correctly reproduced sequence. There were six trials for each sequence length, giving rise to 30 trials in the contour tone context. The same procedure was adopted in the vowel and level tone contexts. The sample-specific internal consistencies were high in the vowel context (α = .84), level tone context (α = .89) and contour tone context (α = .94).
Short-term memory task
Adopted from previous studies (Choi, Tong, & Samuel, 2019; Zheng & Samuel, 2018), this task assessed nonverbal short-term memory. On each trial, a sequence of colors (e.g., red-green-blue) was presented in an object containing four wedges (red, green, blue, and yellow). Participants then reproduced the color sequence by clicking on the corresponding wedges. One point was given for each correctly reproduced sequence. The sequence length increased by one following each correct response. The score would increase by one until the participant failed to produce the sequence. Participants completed the task for five times and the median score was obtained. The sample-specific internal consistency was satisfactory (α = .76).
Nonverbal intelligence task
Used in previous studies (Choi et al., 2019; Zheng & Samuel, 2018), this task provided a quick estimate of participants’ nonverbal intelligence. There were 14 multiple choice questions chosen from two intelligence tasks online (http://www.iq-test.com/free-iq-test/ and http://www.quickiqtest.net). For each question, a picture with an incomplete visual pattern was presented. It was followed by multiple pictures, one of which could complete the visual pattern. One point was given for each correct answer. The sample-specific internal consistency was satisfactory (α = .71).
To examine whether the musicians and the nonmusicians differed in any of the control variables, a multivariate analysis of variance (MANOVA) was conducted with nonverbal intelligence and short-term memory, r(35) = .46, p < .01, being the dependent variables and group being the independent variable. The overall group effect was not significant, ɅWilks’ = .97, F(2, 34) = 0.53, p = .594, indicating that the two groups matched on nonverbal intelligence and short-term memory. Thus, the two control variables were not included in the subsequent analyses.
Cantonese Tone Discrimination Task
The main research question was whether musical advantage was selective to lexical tones. As shown in Figure 2, the musicians appeared to have superior discriminatory performance than the nonmusicians in the HL, HR, and ML tone contexts, but the performance gaps were narrow in the LF, LR, and LL tone contexts. To statistically address the research question, a two-way mixed analysis of variance (ANOVA) was conducted on mean accuracy with tone context (HL, HR, ML, LF, LR, and LL) being the within-subject factor and group (musician and nonmusician) being the between-subjects factor. The analysis yielded a significant main effect of tone context, F(5, 175) = 16.22, p < .001, ηp2 = .32, and a marginally significant main effect of group, F(1, 35) = 3.67, p = .064, ηp2 = .10, reflecting a potential musical advantage in lexical tone discrimination. Consistent with the hypothesis, there was a significant interaction between tone context and group, F(5, 175) = 3.00, p < .05, ηp2 = .08, indicating that the musicians significantly outperformed the nonmusicians only in discriminating some but not all Cantonese tones. Pairwise comparisons further revealed that the musicians significantly outperformed the nonmusicians in the HR tone context, p < .05. Additionally, the musicians marginally outperformed the nonmusicians in the HL tone context, p = .085, and the ML tone context, p = .082. Both groups performed similarly in the LF tone context, p = .197, the LR tone context, p = .648, and the LL tone context, p = .260.
All produced tokens were analyzed acoustically with Praat 5.4.02 (Institute of Phonetic Sciences, University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands). The individual and token-averaged duration, F0 height, minimum F0, maximum F0, F0 onset, F0 offset, and F0 contour are summarized in Tables 1,2-3. To test whether the acoustic features differed significantly as a function of lexical tones, a two-way mixed ANOVA was conducted with acoustic parameter being the within-subject factor and tone being the between-subjects factor. There were significant main effects of tone, F(5, 54) = 11.58, p < .001, ηp2 = .52, and acoustic parameter, F(6, 324) = 767.62, p < .001, ηp2 = .93. Most importantly, the interaction between tone and acoustic parameter was significant, F(30, 324) = 3.37, p < .001, ηp2 = .24. This indicated that the acoustic features, when averaged across tokens, differed across Cantonese tones (see Figures 3 and 4). For example, HL tone had a higher F0 height than LF, LL (ps < .01), HR (p = .071), and LR tones (p = .058). The remaining results are summarized in the Appendix.
The second goal of this study was to identify the potential acoustic underpinnings of the selectivity of musical advantage. For each instance of a tone contrast, the acoustic differences between the contrastive tones were obtained, yielding eight tokens for each tone contrast and 40 tokens in each lexical tone context. Correlational analyses were conducted to identify the potential associations between the acoustic differences and the mean accuracies of (i) the musicians and (ii) the nonmusicians (see Table 4).
Of interest to this study, in the HR tone context where musical advantage was found, correlational analyses yielded marginally significant correlations between F0 contour and the mean accuracy of the musicians, r(38) = .28, p = .083, and between F0 onset and the mean accuracy of the nonmusicians, r(38) = .29, p = .072. These imply that the musicians and the nonmusicians attended to different acoustic cues in the HR tone context. Similarly, in the HL tone context, correlational analyses revealed significant associations between the mean accuracy of the musicians and duration, r(38) = .40, p < .05; F0 height, r(38) = .42, p < .01; maximum F0, r(38) = .35, p < .05; F0 onset, r(38) = .43, p < .01; and F0 offset, r(38) = .33, p < .05, and marginally significant correlations between the mean accuracy of musicians and minimum F0, r(38) = .28, p = .081; and F0 contour, r(38) = .30, p = .056. Contrastively, only a marginally significant correlation was found between the mean accuracy of the nonmusicians and F0 contour, r(38) = .27, p = .096, implying that the nonmusicians attended to F0 contour in the HL tone context. In the ML tone context, a marginally significant association was found between the mean accuracy of the musicians and F0 offset, r(38) = .29, p = .068, and between the mean accuracy of the nonmusicians and F0 contour, r(38) = .28, p = .076, also suggesting that the two groups relied on different acoustic cues.
Interestingly, in the LR tone context where musical selectivity was absent, the two groups attended to the same acoustic cues. In particular, correlational analyses yielded significant associations between F0 contour and the mean accuracy of the musicians, r(38) = .44, p < .01, and the mean accuracy of the nonmusicians, r(38) = .37, p < .05. F0 onset also marginally correlated with the mean accuracy of the musicians, r(38) = .29, p = .068, and the mean accuracy of the nonmusicians, r(38) = .31, p = .052. Lastly, F0 contour correlated significantly with the mean accuracy of the musicians in the LF tone context, r(38) = .40, p < .05, and the LL tone context, r(38) = .40, p < .05.
Sequence Recall Task
A further goal was to examine whether the selectivity of musical advantage was also present at higher perceptual levels. As shown in Figure 5, the musicians appeared to outperform the nonmusicians across all contexts, implying the universality of musical advantage across different tone contrasts. To statistically test the hypothesis, a 2-way mixed ANOVA was conducted on mean accuracy with context (vowel, level tone, and contour tone) being the within-subject factor and group (musician and nonmusician) being the between-subjects factor. The analysis revealed significant main effects of context, F(2, 70) = 61.60, p < .001, ηp2 = .64, and group, F(1, 35) = 7.07, p < .05, ηp2 = .17, reflecting a musical advantage. In line with the hypothesis, there was a significant interaction between context and group, F(2, 70) = 7.15, p < .01, ηp2 = .17. Further analysis showed that the musicians outperformed the nonmusicians only in the contour tone context, p < .01, but not in the vowel, p = .180, and level tone contexts, p = .142. The results suggest that musical advantage is selective to tones even in a more complex perception task. The lack of musical advantage in the vowel context also reflects that the above found musical advantage is not speech general but specific to (contour) tones.
This study endeavored to investigate whether music-to-language transfer was general to all or specific to some Cantonese tones. Consistent with the hypothesis, musical advantage was found only in some but not all Cantonese tone contexts. Remarkably, the selectivity of musical advantage was evident in both AXB discrimination and sequence recall tasks.
The most important finding in the current study is the selectivity of musical advantage. As reviewed in the Introduction, previous studies consistently reported that musicians outperformed nonmusicians in lexical tone perception, providing convergent evidence for the positive impact of musical experience on lexical tone perception (Alexander et al., 2005; Cooper & Wang, 2012; Delogu et al., 2006; Zheng & Samuel, 2018). The present study extends the previous studies by demonstrating that the effect of musical experience on lexical tone perception is not general but differential. Specifically, the English musicians exhibited perceptual advantages over the English nonmusicians only in half of the Cantonese tone contexts. From the theoretical perspective, the OPERA hypothesis argued that music training could enhance neural precision for speech encoding, but there was a lack of specification of whether music-to-language transfer was general or specific (Patel, 2011). The selectivity of musical advantage found herein suggests a need to expand the OPERA hypothesis by incorporating a mechanism that governs how musical experience interacts with phonemes/lexical tones in terms of their phonetic and acoustic properties. Drawing on parallels with the language domain, in the Perceptual Assimilation Model, whether first-language experience is beneficial or detrimental to non-native speech discrimination depends on how the non-native phonemes are assimilated into first-language phonemic categories (Best, 1995; Best & Tyler, 2007; Reid et al., 2015). The second step towards a new model or refined OPERA hypothesis is to explore how some specific phonetic/acoustic properties make certain lexical tones more relevant to musical experience than the other lexical tones do.
Although the specific mechanism governing the selectivity of musical advantage remains unclear, the current results can help to rule out some possible mechanisms. In the Cantonese tone discrimination task, although the musicians had better performance than the nonmusicians in the HL and ML tone contexts, no obvious musical advantage was found in the other level tone context (i.e., the LL tone context). Similarly, for the contour tones, despite the clear musical advantage in the HR tone context, the musicians and nonmusicians performed similarly in the LF and LR tone contexts. Based on the above results, the selectivity of musical advantage does not appear to be governed by the typology (level or contour) of the lexical tones. Apart from typology, the perceptual difficulty of the individual tone contrasts does not seem to drive the selectivity of musical advantage. Indeed, different tone contrasts have different levels of difficulty for English listeners, but no consistent pattern between musical advantage and perceptual difficulty has been observed in the present and previous studies (Qin & Mok, 2011).
That said, the acoustic-behavioral correlational analyses have provided some useful hints about the mechanism governing the selectivity of musical advantage. Despite the close acoustic resemblance between HR and LR tones (see Mok, Zuo, & Wong, 2013), musical experience only favored HR but not LR tone perception. Interestingly, the acoustic-behavioral analyses showed that the musicians attended to F0 contour (a more effective cue for HR tone) while the nonmusicians relied on F0 onset (a less effective cue for HR tone) for HR tone perception. Thus, it is possible that the selectivity of musical advantage is driven by the use of acoustic cues. In particular, it might be the case that musical experience had orientated the musicians to a more reliable acoustic cue (i.e., F0 contour), for HR tone perception. Contrastively, given that both musicians and nonmusicians relied on F0 contour for perceiving LR tone, musical experience had very little facilitative effect on LR tone perception. This potential account for the selectivity of musical advantage is worthy of further examination.
The selectivity of musical advantage was also evident at higher perceptual levels. In the sequence recall task, listeners had to encode Cantonese tones and form representations in the familiarization phase. In the testing phase, listeners had to use Cantonese tones as memory cues to keep track of syllables. One may argue that the outperformance of musicians in the sequence recall task simply arose from enhanced encoding at the auditory level (as manifested in the AXB discrimination task), rather than higher level perceptual processes such as the formation of long-lasting representations and the use of Cantonese tones as memory cues. If enhanced sequence recall was simply due to enhanced encoding, one would expect that musicians outperform nonmusicians in recalling HL-ML sequences since musical advantage was evident in both HL and ML tone contexts in the AXB discrimination task. Critically, this prediction is contradictory to the present results. In this study, musicians did not outperform nonmusicians in recalling HL-ML sequences, even though musical advantage was found in the HL and ML tone contexts in the AXB discrimination task. More importantly, a clear musical advantage in LF-LR sequence recall was evident even though the musicians did not exhibit any relevant musical advantage in the AXB discrimination task. Taken together, results from the AXB and sequence recall tasks imply that the mechanism of music-to-language transfer is not that simple and straightforward. The OPERA hypothesis, in its current form, is a single-tier model that only accounts for how musical experience enhances speech perception at the auditory level. The current findings suggest the need to construct additional tier(s) in the OPERA hypothesis as the results have clearly shown that the musical advantage at higher perceptual levels cannot be fully accounted for by enhanced acoustic encoding at the auditory level.
In terms of methodological contribution, the selectivity of musical advantage identified herein highlights the need to include different tone contrasts or even pitch contrasts when studying cross-domain transfer. In some studies that tested musicians and nonmusicians on lexical tone discrimination, only overall accuracy (collapsed across different tones) was evaluated (e.g., Alexander et al., 2005). This might have masked the potential interactions between musical experience and tone context. Even within the music domain, a previous study showed that musical advantage was selective to pitch intervals among Cantonese listeners (Tong et al., 2018). Taken together, the present and previous findings encourage future studies to evaluate group differences in a fine-grained manner.
Building on the OPERA hypothesis (Patel, 2011), the present study suggests that the perceptual enhancement associated with musical experience is not general but specific to individual tones. This selectivity was evident in both low-level tone discrimination and high-level sequence recall. In contrast to the AXB task, musical experience facilitated the perception of a different set of Cantonese tones in the sequence recall task. This implied that the musicians’ advantage in recalling tonal sequences could not simply be attributed to enhanced acoustic encoding. Future studies, preferably with larger sample sizes and enhanced statistical power, are warranted to elucidate the intricate mechanism governing music-to-language transfer.
I gratefully acknowledge Mairéad MacSweeney for her dedicated support. I also thank Peter Pfordresher and an anonymous reviewer for their constructive suggestions. Appreciation also to Arthur Samuel for sharing the control tasks, and to Michelle Yun Sze Tse and Junyuan Seng for their assistance in stimuli development. This research was supported by the Croucher Postdoctoral Fellowship from the Croucher Foundation to William Choi.
Studies on tone merging have shown that even native Cantonese listeners are not able to discriminate the HR-LR tone pair (e.g., Mok et al., 2013; Ou & Law, 2016). Similar to native Cantonese listeners, neither group in this study demonstrated above chance performance in discriminating the HR-LR tone pair. Thus, it was not included in the analysis.
Variations of Acoustic Parameters Across Cantonese Tones
F0 height. HL tone had a significantly higher F0 height than LF and LL tones, ps < .01, and HR, p = .071, and LR tones, p = .058.
Minimum F0. HL tone had a significantly higher minimum F0 than HR, LF, LR and LL tones, ps < .05. ML tone had a significantly higher minimum F0 than LF tone, p < .05.
Maximum F0. HL and HR tones had significantly higher maximum F0 than LF and LL tones, ps < .05. LR tone had a significantly higher maximum F0 than LF, p = .088, and LL tones, p < .05.
F0 onset. HL tone had a significantly higher F0 onset than HR, LF, LR and LL tones, ps < .05.
F0 offset. HL, HR and LR tones had significantly higher F0 offsets than LF and LL tones, ps < .05.
F0 contour. HR and LR tones had significantly larger contour changes than HL, ML, LF and LL tones, ps < .01.
Duration. No significant durational difference was found across the Cantonese tones, ps = 1.00.