An objective indicator of musical imagery is developed that involves tracking the up and down movements of the tonal contour of an imagined musical phrase or tune. In two experiments, college students' imagery of music was examined. In both experiments, subjects learned musical phrases with words (songs) and without words (melodies). They then indicated as rapidly as possibly the tonal contour. In Experiment 1, the primary issue was whether musical imagery (as distinct from kinesthetic or visual imagery) drew on the same representation as overt song. Subjects processed the phrases by using either an imaginal or overtly sung representation. No difference in processing time was found between the imaginal and overt modes of representation, consistent with a common representation. A second issue was "tonal primacy," the priority of tonal coding over verbal or word coding in musical phrases; in fact, songs (with words) were processed as well or better than melodies (without words). No evidence favoring tonal primacy was found. In Experiment 2, the issues examined were possible kinesthetic or visual image coding of pitch representation and possible sharing of tonal and verbal generation processes for musical imagery and auditory imagery. Spoken responses for classifying tonal relations took longer than written responses, indicating that kinesthetic and visual image coding was unlikely and that the pitch generation of musical imagery shared resources with a more general auditory imagery.

References

References
Brooks, L. Spatial and verbal components of the act of recall. Canadian Journal of Psychol- ogy, 1968, 22, 349-368.
Farah, M. J. The neurological basis of mental imagery: a componential analysis. Cognition, 1985, 18,
Farah, M. J., & Smith, A. F. Perceptual interference and facilitation with auditory imagery. Perception & Psychophysics, 1983, 33, 475-478.
Fodor, J. A. The modularity of mind. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, 1983.
Giddings, T. P., Earhart, W., & Baldwin, R. L. Introductory music. Boston: Crinn and Com- pany, 1923.
Harré, R. Great scientific experiments. Oxford, England: Phaidon Press, 1981.
Kosslyn, S. M. Image and mind. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1980.
Mainwaring, J. Kinaesthetic factors in the recall ot musical experience. British Journal of Psychology, 1933, 23, 284-307.
Marin, O. S. M. Neurological aspects of music perception and performance. In D. Deutsch (Ed.), The psychology of music. New York: Academic Press, 1982.
Podgorny, P., & Sheperd, R. N. Functional representations common to visual perception and imagination. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Perform- ance, 1978, 4, 21-35.
Polya, G. Patterns of plausible inference (Vol. 2). Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1954.
Seashore, C. E., Lewis, D., & Saetveit, J. G. Seashore measures of musical ability. New York: The Psychological Corporation, 1960.
Segal, S. J., & Fusella, V. Influence of imaged pictures and sounds on detection of visual and auditory signals, Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1970, 83, 458-464.
Sessions, R. Questions about music. New York: W. W. Norton, 1970.
Sheperd, R. The mental image. American Psychologist, 1978, 33, 125-137.
Sullivan, J. W. Beethoven: His spiritual development. New York: Vintage Books, 1960.
Weber, R. J., Blagowsky, J., & Mankin, R. Switching time between overt and covert speech: generative attention. Memory and Cognition, 1982, 10, 546-553.
Weber, R. J., & Castleman, J. The time it takes to imagine. Perception and Psychophysics, 1970, 8,, 165-168.
Weber, R. J., & Harnish, R. Visual imagery for words: The Hebb test. Journal of Experi- mental Psychology, 1974, 102,409-414.
Weber, R. J., Hochhaus, L., & Brown, W. D. Equivalence of perceptual and imaginal repre- sentation: developmental changes. In J. Long & A. Baddeley (Eds.), Attention and Per- formance IX. Hillsdale, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1981.
Weber, R. J., & Kelley, J. Aspects of visual and acoustic imagery. Psychonomic Science, 1972, 27, 121-122.
Weber, R. J., Kelley, J., & Little, S. Is visual image sequencing under verbal control? Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1972, 96, 354-362.
This content is only available via PDF.