A critical and comparative review of the various methods currently used in experimental studies of tonality induction is presented. First, we deal with pitfalls in the selection of subjects, specifically focusing on the issue of contrasting more-experienced and less-experienced listeners. Next, we discuss some dilemmas with respect to the selection of stimuli. In particular, we compare the (dis) advantages of using real music stimuli with the (dis) advantages of artificial stimuli, distinguishing in the latter category between prototypical stimuli (e.g., chords or scale fragments) and tonally complex or even polytonal stimuli. Finally, we consider the (dis) advantages of various possible experimental paradigms, notably the production of a tonic and tonal center, the probe-tone paradigm, and tonality rating. For each of the three methodological subdomains, we propose recommendations for improvement.

[Footnotes]

[Footnotes]
1
Sloboda, 1985, chap. 2

References

References
Abe, J., & Hoshino, E. (1985). Schema-driven properties in melody cognition: Experiments on final-tone extrapolation by music experts. The Japanese Journal of Psychonomic Science, 4, 1-9.
Auhagen, W. (1994). Experimentelle Untersuchungen zur auditiven Tonalitatsbestimmung in Melodien. Regensburg: Gustav Bosse Verlag.
Besson, M., & Friederici, A. D. (1998). Language and music: A comparative view. Music Perception, 16, 1-9.
Brown, H. (1988). The interplay of set content and temporal context in a functional theory of tonality perception. Music Perception, 5, 219-250.
Brown, H., & Butler, D. (1981). Diatonic trichords as minimal tonal cue cells. In Theory Only, 5/6-7, 39-55.
Brown, H., Butler, D., & Jones, M. R. (1994). Musical and temporal influences on key discovery. Music Perception, 11, 371-407.
Browne, R. (1981). Tonal implications of the diatonic set. In Theory Only, , 5/6-7, 3-21.
Butler, D. (1990). A study of event hierarchies in tonal and post-tonal music. Psychology of Music, 18, 4-17.
Butler, D. (1992). On pitch-set properties and perceptual attributes of the minor mode. In M. R. Jones & S. Holleran, Cognitive bases of musical communication (pp. 161-169). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Butler, D. & Ward, D. (1988). Effacing the memory of musical pitch. Music Perception, 5, 251-260.
Castellano, M. A., Krumhansl, C. L., & Bharucha, J. J. (1984). Tonal hierarchies in the music of North India. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 113, 394-412.
Cohen, A. (1991). Tonality and perception: musical scales primed by excerpts from the Well-Tempered Clavier of ï. S. Bach. Psychological Research, 53, 305-314.
Cohen, A. J. (2000). Development of tonality induction: Plasticity, exposure, and training. Music Perception, 17. 437-459.
Cohen, J. (1977). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd éd.). New York: Academic Press.
Cuddy, L. L. (1982). On hearing pattern in melody. Psychology of Music, 10, 3-10.
Cuddy, L. L., & Badertscher, B. (1987). Recovery ot the tonal hierarchy: Some comparisons across age and levels of musical experience. Perception & Psychophysics, 41, 609-620.
Cuddy, L. L., Cohen, A. J., & Mewhort, D. J. K. (1981). Perception of structure in short melodic sequences. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Perfor- mance, 7, 869-883.
Cuddy, L. L., & Lyons, H. I. (1981). Musical pattern recognition: a comparison of listen- ing to and studying tonal structures and tonal ambiguities. Psychomusicology, 1(2), 15-33.
Deutsch, D. (1991). The tritone paradox: An influence of language on music perception. Music Perception. 8. 335-347.
Eberlein, R., & Fricke, J. P. (1992). Kadenzwahrnehmung und Kadenzgeschichte: ein Beitrag zur Grammatik der Musik. Frankfurt/Main: Peter Lang .
Eberlein, R. (1993). Ein rekursives System als Ursache der Gestalt der tonalen Klangsyntax. Systematische Musikwissenschaft, I, 339-351.
Eberlein, R. (1994). Die Entstehung der tonalen Klangsyntax. Frankfurt/Main: Peter Lang.
Hershman, D. P. (1995). Rhythmic factors in tonality. Psychomusicology, 14, 4-19.
Hoshino, E., & Abe, J. (1984). "Tonality" and the final tone extrapolation in melody cog- nition. The Japanese Journal of Psychology, 54, 344-350.
Howell, P., West, R., & Cross, I. (1984). The detection of notes incompatible with scalar structure. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 76, 1682-1689.
Imberty, M. (1969). L'acquisition des structures tonales chez I enfant. Pans: Publications de Faculté des Lettres et Sciences Humaines de Paris-Nanterre, Série A,7.
Janata, P., & Petsche, H. (1993). Spectral analysis of the EEG as a tool for evaluating expectancy violations in musical contexts. Music Perception, 10, 281-304.
Kessler, E., Hansen, C, & Shepard, R. (1984). Tonal schemata in the perception of music in Bali and in the West. Music Perception, 2, 131-165.
Krumhansl, C. (1990). Cognitive foundations of musical pitch. New York: Oxford Univer- sity Press .
Krumhansl, C. (1995). Effects of musical context on similarity and expectancy. Systematische Musikwissenschaft, 111(2), 211-250.
Krumhansl, C. (2000). Tonality induction: A statistical approach applied cross-culturally. Music Perception, 17, 461-479.
Krumhansl, C. L., Bharucha, J., & Castellano, M. A. (1982). Key distance effects on per- ceived harmonic structure in music. Perception & Psychophysics, 32, 96-108.
Krumhansl, C. L., & Kessler, E. J. (1982). Tracing the dynamic changes in perceived tonal organization in a spatial representation of musical keys. Psychological Review, 89, 334- 368.
Krumhansl, C. L., Sandell, G. J., & Sergeant, D. (1987). The perception of tone hierarchies and mirror forms in twelve-tone serial music. Music Perception, 5, 31-77.
Kiihn, W. (1919). Experimentelle Untersuchungen iiber das Tonalitàtsgeruhl. Beitràge zur Anatomie, Physiologie, Pathologie und Thérapie des Ohres, der Nase und des Halses, XIII, 254-278.
Lamont, A.,& Cross, 1. (1994). Children s cognitive representations or musical pitch. Mu- sic Perception, 12, 27-55.
Léman, M. (1995). Music and schema theory. Cognitive foundations of systematic musicol- ogy. Berlin: Springer.
Parncutt, R. (1995). Perceptual modeling oî the hnality or harmonic cadences. Systematische Musikwissenschaft, HI, 71-85.
Pechstedt, P. H., Kershner, J., & Kinsbourne, M. (1989). Musical training improves pro- cessing of tonality in the left hemisphere. Music Perception, 6, 275-298.
Reti, R. (1978). Tonality, atonality, pantonality. A study of some trends m twentieth cen- tury music. Westport, Conn.: Greenwood. (Original work published 1958)
Rosner, B. S., & Narmour, E. (1992). Harmonic closure: music theory and perception. Music Perception, 9, 383-412.
Schmuckler, M. (1989). Expectation in music: Investigation of melodic and harmonic pro- cesses. Music Perception, 7, 109-150.
Simonton, D. K. (1984). Melodic structure and note transition probabilities: a content analysis of 15.618 classical themes. Psychology of Music, 12, 3-15.
Sloboda, J. A. (1985). The musical mind. The cognitive psychology of music. Oxford: Clarendon Press .
Thompson, W. E, & Cuddy, L. (1989). Sensitivity to key change in chorale sequences: A comparison of single voices and four- voice harmony. Music Perception, 7, 151-168.
Thompson, W. F., & Mor, S. (1992). A perceptual investigation of polytonahty. Psychologi- cal Research, 54, 60-71.
Vos, P. G. (2000). Tonality induction: Theoretical problems and dilemmas. Music Percep- tion 17,403-416.
Vos, P. G.,& Gremmen, F. M. (2000). Pitch class frequency constraints in major and minor solo compositions by J. S. Bach. Manuscript submitted for publication.
Vos, P. G., & Verkaart, P. P. (1999). Mode inference in unaccompanied melodies. Music Perception, 17, 223-239.
West, R. J., 8c Fryer, R. (1990). Ratings of suitability of probe tones as tonics after random orderings of notes of the diatonic scale. Music Perception, 7, 253-258.
This content is only available via PDF.