Iterative rules appear everywhere in music cognition, creating strong expectations. Consequently, denial of rule projection becomes an important compositional strategy, generating numerous possibilities for musical affect. Other rules enter the musical aesthetic through reflexive game playing. Still other kinds are completely constructivist in nature and may be uncongenial to cognition, requiring much training to be recognized, if at all. Cognitive rules are frequently found in contexts of varied repetition (AA), but they are not necessarily bounded by stylistic similarity. Indeed, rules may be especially relevant in the processing of unfamiliar contexts (AB), where only abstract coding is available. There are many kinds of deduction in music cognition. Typical examples include melodic sequence, partial melodic sequence, and alternating melodic sequence (which produces streaming). These types may coexist in the musical fabric, involving the invocation of both simultaneous and nested rules. Intervallic expansion and reduction in melody also involve higherorder abstractions. Various mirrored forms in music entail rule-mapping as well, although these may be more difficult to perceive than their analogous visual symmetries. Listeners can likewise deduce additivity and subtractivity at work in harmony, tempo, texture, pace, and dynamics. Rhythmic augmentation and diminution, by contrast, rely on multiplication and division. The examples suggest numerous hypotheses for experimental research.


Selfridge- Field, 1998).
Meyer (1973, p. 51)
(Meyer, 1956, p. 152),
invoking context (1973, p. 51).
Narmour, 1991).
(Dowling, 1978, 1991; Dowling & Fujitani, 1971; Dowling, Kwak, & Andrews, 1995).
Bartlett & Dowling, 1980; Watkins, 1985)
Dowling & Bartlett, 1981);
(Edworthy, 1985).
Takeuchi & Hulse, 1992;
Egmond, Povel, & Maris, 1996).
Frances, 1957/ 1988, Egmond et al., 1996).
Bowen, 1996; Clarke, 1989;
Epstein, 1985, 1995;
Feldman, Epstein, &
Richards, 1992;
Palmer, 1989;
Repp, 1992, 1994, 1997a, 1997b;
Sundberg &
Verrillo, 1980;
Todd, 1985, 1995.
Schuller (1997).
Cooper and Meyer [1960, p. 3]
Berry [1966, p. 317]).
(Berry, 1966, p. 397).
Mendelssohn, Symphony no. 5, II.
Rosner and Meyer's experiment (1986)
Crist, DeLone, Kliewer, Rowell, & Thomson (1982, p. 91),
Stucky (1981)
Jones (1981, pp. 496-497)


Arnheim, R. (1969). Visual thinking. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Bartlett, J. C, & Dowling, W. J. (1980). Recognition or transposed melodies: A key-dis- tance effect in developmental perspective. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 6, 501-515.
Berry, W. (1966). Form in music. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Boltz, M., & Jones, M. R. (1986). Does rule recursion make melodies easier to reproduce? If not, what does? Cognitive Psychology, 18, 389-431.
Boltz, M., Marshburn, E., Jones, J. R., & Johnson, W. W. (1985). Serial-pattern structure and temporal-order recognition. Perception & Psychophysics, 1985, 209-217.
Bowen, J. (1996). Tempo, duration, and flexibility: Techniques m the analysis or perfor- mance. Journal of Musicological Research, 16, 1-47.
Bregman, A. S. (1990). Auditory scene analysis. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Bruce V. (1991). Face recognition. Hillsdale, NY: Erlbaum
Clarke, E. F. (1989). The perception of expressive timing in music. Psychological Research, 51, 2-9.
Cooper, G., & Meyer, L. B. (1960). The rhythmic structure of music. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Crist, W., DeLone, R., Kliewer, V., Rowell, L., & Thomson, W. (1982). Materials and struc- ture of music. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Dehaene, S., Spelke, E., Pinel, P., Stanescu, R., & Tsivkin, S. (1999). Sources of mathemati- cal thinking: Behavioral and brain-imagine evidence. Science, 284, 970-974.
Deutsch, D. (1999). The processing of pitch combinations. In D. Deutsch (Ed.), The psy- chology of music (2nd ed., pp. 349-411). San Diego: Academic Press.
Dowling, W. J. (1972). Recognition of melodic transformations: Inversion, retrograde, and retrograde inversion. Perception & Psychophysics, 12, 417-421
Dowling, W. J. (1978). Scale and contour: Two components of a theory of memory for melodies. Psychological Review, 85, 341-354.
Dowling, W. J. (1991). Tonal strength and melody recognition after long and short delays. Perception & Psychophysics, 50, 305-313.
Dowling, W. J. (1994). Melodic contour in hearing and remembering melodies. In R. Aiello (Ed.), Musical perceptions (pp. 173-190). New York: Oxford University Press.
Dowling, W. J., & Bartlett, J. C. (1981). The importance of interval information in long- term memory for melodies. Psychomusicology, 1, 30-49.
Dowling, W. J., & Fujitani, D. S. (1971). Contour, interval, and pitch recognition in memory for melodies. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 49, 524-531.
Dowling, W. J., Kwak, S., & Andrews, M. (1995). The time course of recognition of novel melodies. Perception & Psychophysics, 57, 136-149.
Edworthy, (1985). Interval and contour in melody processing. Music Perception, 2, 375- 388.
Epstein, D. (1985). Tempo relations: A cross-cultural study. Music Theory Spectrum, 7, 34- 71.
Epstein, D. (1995). Shaping time: Music, the brain, and performance. New York: Schirmer.
Feldman, J., Epstein, D., & Richards, W. (1992). Force dynamics of tempo change in music. Music Perception, 10, 185-203.
Francès, R. (1988). The perception of music (W. J. Dowling, Trans.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. (Original work published 1957)
Gattis, M., & Holyoak, K. J. (1996). Mapping conceptual to spatial relations in visual reasoning. Journal of Experimental Psychology; Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 22, 231-239.
Gjerdingen, R. (1988). A classic turn of phrase: Music and the psychology of convention. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
Goldstone, R. L. (1993). Feature distribution and biased estimation of visual displays. Jour- nal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 19, 564-579.
Green, D. (1965). Form in tonal music. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
Halpern, A. R., Bartlett, J. C, & Dowling, W. J. (1998). Perception of mode, rhythm, and contour in unfamiliar melodies: Effects of age and experience. Music Perception, 15, 335-355.
Hofstadter, D. R. (1979). Gödel, Escher, Bach: An eternal golden braid. New York: Basic Books.
Hudson, R. (1994). Stolen time: The history of tempo rubato. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Jones, M. R. (1974). Cognitive representations of serial patterns. In B. H. Kantowitz (Ed.), Human information processing: Tutorials in performance and cognition (pp. 187-229). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Jones, M. R. (1981). A tutorial on some issues and methods in serial pattern research. Perception & Psychophysics, 30, 492-504.
Jones, M. R. (1987). Dynamic pattern structure in music: Recent theory and research. Per- ception and Psychophysics, 41, 621-634.
Jones, M. R. (1990). Learning and the development of expectancies: An interactionist ap- proach. Psychomusicology, 9, 193-228.
Jones, M. R., & Ralston, J. T. (1991). Some influences of accent structure on melody recog- nition. Memory and Cognition, 19, 8-20.
Kihlstrom, J. F. (1987). The cognitive unconscious. Science, 237, 1445-1452.
Krumhansl, C. L. (1997). Effects of perceptual organization and musical form on melodic expectancies. In M. Leman (Ed.), Music, gestalt, and computing (pp. 294-320). Berlin: Springer.
Krumhansl, C. L., Sandell, G. J., & Sargeant, D. C. (1987). The perception of tone hierar- chies and mirror forms in twelve-tone serial music. Music Perception, 4, 153-184.
Marcus, G. E, Vijayan, S., Rao, S. Bandi, & Vishton, P. M. (1999). Rule learning by seven- month-old infants. Science, 283, 77-80.
Matthay, T. (1913). Musical interpretation. Boston: Boston Music.
McEwen, J. B. (1928). Tempo rubato or time-variation in musical performance. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Medin, D. L., Goldstone, R. L., & Gentner, D. (1993). Respects for similarity. Psychologi- cal Review, 100, 254-278.
Medin, D. L., Goldstone, R. L., & Markman, A. B. (1995). Comparison and choice: Rela- tions between similarity processes and decision processes. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 2, 1-19
Messiaen, O. (1956). The technique of my musical language (J. Salterfield, Trans.). Paris: Alphonse Leduc.
Meyer, L. B. (1956). Emotion and meaning in music. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Meyer, L. B. (1973). Explaining music. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Meyer, L. B. (1989). Style and music. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
Morgan, R. P. (1992). Anthology of twentieth-century music. New York: W. W. Norton.
Narmour, E. (1977). Beyond Schenkerism: The need for alternatives in music analysis. Chi- cago: University of Chicago Press.
Narmour, E. (1988). Melodic structuring of harmonic dissonance: Chopin's contribution to the development of harmony. In J. Samson (Ed.), Chopin studies (pp. 77-114). Cam- bridge: Cambridge University Press.
Narmour, E. (1990). The analysis and cognition of basic melodic structures: The implica- tion-realization model. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Narmour, E. (1991). The top-down and bottom-up systems of musical implication: Build- ing on Meyer's theory of emotional syntax. Music Perception, 9, 1-26.
Narmour, E. (1992). The analysis and cognition of melodic complexity: The implication- realization model. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1992.
Narmour, E. (1996). Analyzing form and measuring perceptual content in Mozart's piano sonata K. 282: A new theory of parametric analogues. Music Perception, 13, 265-318.
Narmour, E. (1999). Hierarchical expectation and musical style. In D. Deutsch (Ed.), The psychology of music (2nd ed., pp. 441-472). New York: Academic Press.
Nisbett, R. E. (1993). Reasoning, abstraction, and the prejudices of 20th century psychol- ogy. In R. E. Nisbett (Ed.), Rules for reasoning (pp. 1-12). Hillsdale, NT: Erlbaum.
Palmer, C. (1989). Mapping musical thought to musical performance. Journal of Experi- mental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 15, 331-346.
Pazzani, M. J. (1991). Influence of prior knowledge on concept acquisition: Experimental and computational results. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 17, 416-432.
Perle, G. (1977). Twelve-tone tonality. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Perle, G. (1980). The operas of Alban Berg (Vol. 1). Berkeley: University of California Press.
Pinker, S. (1999). Out of the minds of babes. Science, 283, 40-41.
Randel, D. M. (1986). The new Harvard dictionary of music. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press.
Repp, B. H. (1992). A constraint on the expressive timing of a melodic gesture: Evidence from performance and aesthetic judgment. Music Perception, 10, 221-241.
Repp, B. H. (1994). Relational invariance of expressive microstructure across global tempo changes in music performance: An exploratory study. Psychological Research, 56, 269- 284.
Repp, B. H. (1997a). The aesthetic quality of a quantitatively average music performance: Two preliminary experiments. Music Perception, 14, 419-444.
Repp, B. H. (1997b). Expressive timing in a Debussy prelude: A comparison of student and expert pianists. Musicae Scientiae, 1, 257-266.
Restle, F. (1970). Theory of serial pattern learning: Structural trees. Journal of Experimen- tal Psychology, 92, 385-390.
Rosner, B., & Meyer, L. B. (1986). The perceptual roles of melodic process, contour, and form. Music Perception, 4, 1-39
Sadler, D. D., & Shoben, E. J. (1993). Context effects on semantic domains as seen in analogy solution. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cogni- tion, 19, 128-147.
Salzer, F. (1962). Structural hearing. New York: Dover.
Schenker, H. (1954). Harmony. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Schiff, D. (1983). The music of Elliott Carter. London: Eulenburg.
Schoenberg, A. (1975). Style and idea (L. Stein, Ed.). London: Faber and Faber. (Original work published 1950)
Schuller, G. (1997). The compleat conductor. New York: Oxford University Press.
Selfridge-Field, E. (1998). Conceptual and representational issues in melodic comparison. In W. B. Hewlett &E. Selfridge-Field (Eds.), Melodic similarity: Concepts, procedures, and applications (Computing in Musicology 11). Stanford: Center for Computer As- sisted Research in the Humanities.
Simon, H. A. (1972). Complexity and the representation of patterned sequences of sym- bols. Psychological Review, 79, 369-382.
Slobodkin, L. B. (1992). Simplicity and complexity in games of the intellect. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Smith, E. E., Langston, E., & Nisbett, R. E. (1993). The case for rules in reasoning. In R. E. Nisbett (Ed.), Rules for reasoning (pp. 361-397). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Solso, R. L. (1994). Cognition and the visual arts. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Stucky, S. (1981). Lutoslawski and his music. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Sundberg, J., & Verrillo, V. (1980). On the anatomy of the ritard: A study of timing in music. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 68, 772-779.
Takeuchi, A. H., & Hulse, S. H. (1992). Key-distance effects in melody recognition reexam- ined. Music Perception, 10, 1-23.
Tenney J., with Polansky, L (1980). Meta + hodos--a phenomenology of 20th century mu- sic and an approach to the study of form. New Orleans: Tulane University Press.
Toch, E. (1977). The shaping forces of music. New York: Dover Publications.
Todd, N. P. (1985). A model of expressive timing in tonal music. Music Perception, 3, 33- 58.
Todd, N. P. (1995). The kinematics of musical expression. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 97, 1940-1949.
Tovey, D. F. (1965). Essays in musical analysis (Vol. I). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Tversky, B. (1977). Features of similarity. Psychological Review, 84, 327-352.
Uttal, W. R. (1988). On seeing forms. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
van Egmond, R., & Povel, D.-J. (1996). Perceived similarity of exact and inexact transposi- tions. Acta Psychologica, 92, 283-295.
van Egmond, R., Povel, D.-J., & Maris, E. (1996). The influence of height and key on the perceptual similarity of transposed melodies. Perception & Psychophysics, 58, 1252- 1259.
Vos, P. G., van Assen, M., & Franek, M. (1997). Perceived tempo change is dependent on base tempo and direction of change: Evidence for a generalized version of Schulze's (1978) internal beat model. Psychological Research, 59, 240-247.
Wagner, R. (1897). On conducting (E. Dannreuther, Trans.). London: W. Reeves. (Original work published 1869)
Watkins, A. J. (1985). Scale, key, and contour in the discrimination of tuned and mistuned approximations to melody. Perception & Psychophysics, 37, 275-285.
Willats, J. (1998). Art and representation. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Winters, T. (1986). Additive and repetitive techniques in the experimental works of Charles Ives. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Pennsylvania.
Wisniewski, E. J., & Medin, D. L. (1994). On the interaction of theory and data in concept learning. Cognitive Science, 18, 221-281.
This content is only available via PDF.