In descriptions of melodic structure, "pitch proximity" is usually defined as the tendency for small pitch intervals to outnumber large ones. This definition is valid as far as it goes; however, an alternative definition is preferable. The alternative defines pitch proximity in terms of two more basic constraints—a constraint on tessitura (or pitch distribution) and a constraint on "mobility" (or freedom of motion). This new definition offers several advantages. Whereas the usual definition predicts only interval size, the new definition predicts interval direction as well. The usual definition predicts small intervals generally, whereas the new definition predicts context- sensitive variations in interval size. Finally, if the new definition is given the first few notes in a melody, it can assign a probability to each of the pitches that could occur next. In sum, the new definition offers a more precise and detailed description of melodic structure.

[Footnotes]

[Footnotes]
1
Fucks (1962)
Merriam (1964).
Merriam, Whinery and Fred (1956).
3
(Darlington, 1990),
4
(Madansky, 1988).

References

References
Apel, W. (1969). Harvard dictionary of music. (2nd ed.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univer- sity Press.
Bregman, A. S. (1990). Auditory scene analysis: The perceptual organization of sound. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Brockwell, P. J., & Davis, R. A. (1996). Introduction to time series and forecasting. New York: Springer-Verlag.
Carlsen, J. C. (1981). Some factors which influence melodic expectancy. Psychomusicology, 1, 12-29.
Chung-kuo yin yiieh yen chiu so [Chinese Music Research Institute]. (1959). Chung-kuo min ke Chung-kuo yin yiieh yen chiu so pien [Chinese folk songs]. Beijing: Yin yiieh ch'u panshê.
Darlington, R. B. (1990). Regression and linear models. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Densmore, F. (1910). Chippewa [i.e., Ojibway] music. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
Densmore, F. (1913). Chippewa [i.e., Ojibway] music--II. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
Dowling, W. J. (1967). Rhythmic fission and the perceptual organization of tone sequences. Unpublished Ph.D. thesis, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA.
Eitan, Z. (1993). Melodic contour and musical style: A quantitative study. In M. G. Boroda (Ed.), Fundamentals of musical language: An interdisciplinary approach (pp. 1-68). Bochum, Germany: Brockmeyer.
Eitan, Z. (1997). Highpoints: A study of melodic peaks. Philadelphia: University of Penn- sylvania Press.
Fucks, W. (1962). Mathematical analysis of formal structure of music. IRE Transactions on Information Theory, 8, S225-S228.
Huron, D. (1994). Interval-class content in equally tempered pitch-class sets: Common scales exhibit optimum tonal consonance. Music Perception, 11(3), 289-305.
Huron, D. (1999). Zohar Eitan: Highpoints: A study of melodic peaks [Review of the book]. Music Perception, 16(2), 257-264.
Krumhansl, C. L. (1990). Cognitive foundations of musical pitch. Oxford: Oxford Univer- sity Press.
Madansky, A. (1988). Prescriptions for working statisticians. New York: Springer- Verlag.
Makeba, M. (1971). The world of African song. Chicago: Quadrangle Press.
Merriam, A. (1964). Anthropology of music. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.
Merriam, A. P., Whinery, S., & Fred, B. G. (1956). Songs of a Rada community in Trinidad. Anthropos, 51, 157-174.
Meyer, L. B. (1956). Emotion and meaning in music. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Nanino, G. M., & Nanino, G. B. (ca. 1600). Regole di contrappunto [Rules of counter- point]. Unpublished manuscript, Civico Museo Bibliografico Musicale, Bologna, Italy.
Narmour, E. (1990). The analysis and cognition of basic melodic structures: The implica- tion-realization model. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Ortmann, O. R. (1926). On the melodic relativity ot tones. Psychological Monographs, 35(162).
Schaffrath, H. (1995). The Essen folksong collection in the Humdrum * *kern format [Com- puter database]. Menlo Park, CA: Center for Computer Assisted Research in the Hu- manities.
Smith, A. B. (1997). A "cumulative" method of quantifying tonal consonance in musical key contexts. Music Perception, 15(2), 175-188.
Terhardt, E., Stoll, G., & Seewann, M. (1982). Pitch of complex signals according to vir- tual-pitch theory: Tests, examples, and predictions. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 71(3), 679-688.
Toch, E. (1948). The shaping forces in music: An inquiry into harmony, melody, counter- point, form. New York: Criterion Music.
von Hippel, P. (1998). 42 Ojibway folksongs in the Humdrum * *kem representation: Elec- tronic transcriptions from the Densmore collection [Computer database]. Columbus, OH: Ohio State University, Cognitive and Systematic Musicology Laboratory (www.music-cog.ohio-state.edu/~pvh).
von Hippel, P., & Huron, D. (1999). Why do skips precede reversals? The effect of tessitura on melodic structure. Manuscript submitted for publication.
Watt, H. J. (1924). Functions of the size of interval in the songs of Schubert and of the Chippewa [i.e., Ojibway] and Teton Sioux [i.e., Lakota] Indians. British Journal of Psy- chology, 14(4), 370-386.
Zipf, G. K. (1949). Human behavior and the principle of least effort. Cambridge, MA: Addison- Wesley Press.
This content is only available via PDF.