A number of attempts have been made in the past 10 to 15 years to construct artificial systems that can simulate human expressive performance, but few systematic studies of the relationship between model output and comparable human performances have been undertaken. In this study, we assessed listeners' responses to real and artificially generated performances. Subjects were asked to identify and evaluate performances of two differently notated editions of two pieces, played by a panel of experienced pianists and by an artificial performer. The results suggest that expressive timing and dynamics do not relate to one another in the simple manner that is implemented in the model (Todd, 1992) used here, that small objective differences in the expressive profiles of different performances can lead to distinctly different judgments by listeners, and that what appears to be the same expressive feature in performance can fulfill different functions. Although one purpose of such a study is to assess the model on which it is based, more important is its demonstration of the general value of comparing human data with a model. As is often the case, it is what the model does not explain that is most interesting.

[Footnotes]

[Footnotes]
6
Clarke (1997)
Todd (1992)
11
Todd, 1992, p. 3544

References

References
Clark, H. H., & Clark, E. V. (1977). Psychology and language: An introduction to psycholinguistics. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
Clynes, M. (1983). Expressive microstructure in music, linked to living qualities. In J. Sundberg (Ed.), Studies of music performance (Publication No. 39, pp. 76-181). Stockholm: Royal Swedish Academy of Music.
Clynes, M. (1987). What can a musician learn from newly discovered microstructure prin- ciples (PM and PAS)? In A. Gabrielsson (Ed.), Action and perception in rhythm and music (Publication No. 55, pp. 201-233). Stockholm: Royal Swedish Academy of Mu- sic.
Clynes, M. (1995). Microstructural musical linguistics: composers pulses are liked most by the best musicians. Cognition, 55, 269-310.
Desain, P., & Honing, H. (1991). Towards a calculus for expressive timing in music. Com- puters in Music Research, 3, 43-120.
Gabrielsson, A. (1987). Once again: The theme from Mozart's piano sonata in A major (K. 331). In A. Gabrielsson (Ed.), Action and perception in rhythm and music (Publication No. 55, pp. 81-103). Stockholm: Royal Swedish Academy of Music.
Honing, H. (1990). POCO: An environment for analysing, modifying, and generating ex- pression in music. In Proceedings of the 1990 International Computer Music Confer- ence (pp. 364-368). San Francisco: Computer Music Association.
Kronman, U., & Sundberg, J. (1987). Is the musical ritard an allusion to physical motion? In A. Gabrielsson (Ed.), Action and perception in rhythm and music (Publication No. 55, pp. 57-68). Stockholm: Royal Swedish Academy of Music.
Lerdahl, E, & Jackendoff, R. (1983). A generative theory of tonal music. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Longuet-Higgins, H. C, & Lisle, E. (1989). Modelling music cognition. Contemporary Music Review, 3, 15-27.
Meyer, L. B. (1973). Explaining music. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Palmer, C. (1989). Mapping musical thought to musical performance. Journal of Experi- mental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 15, 331-346.
Palmer, C. (1996). Anatomy of a performance: sources of musical expression. Music Per- ception, 13, 433-454.
Repp, B. H. (1989). Expressive microstructure in music: a preliminary perceptual assess- ment of four composers' "pulses." Music Perception, 6, 243-274.
Repp, B. H. (1990a). Composers' pulses: Science or Art? Music Perception, 7, 243-274.
Repp, B. H. (1990b). Further perceptual evaluations of pulse microstructure in computer performances of classical piano music. Music Perception, 8, 243-274.
Repp, B. H. (1999). A microcosm of musical expression: II. Quantitative analysis of pia- nists' dynamics in the initial measures of Chopin's Etude in E major. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 105, 1972-1988.
Sloboda, J. A. (1983). The communication of musical metre in piano performance. Quar- terly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 35 A, 377-396.
Sundberg, J., Frydén, L. & Askenfelt, A. (1983). What tells you the player is musical? In J. Sundberg (Ed.), Studies of music performance (Publication No. 39, pp. 61-75). Stockholm: Royal Swedish Academy of Music.
Thompson, W. F. (1989). Composer-specific aspects of musical performance: An evaluation of Clynes' theory of pulse for performances of Mozart and Beethoven. Music Percep- tion, 7, 243-274.
Thompson, W. F., Sundberg, J., Friberg, A., & Frydén, L. (1989). The use of rules for expression in the performance of melodies. Psychology of Music, 17, 63-82.
Todd, N. P. (1985). A model of expressive timing in tonal music. Music Perception, 3, 33- 58.
Todd, N. P. (1992). The dynamics of dynamics: A model of musical expression. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 91, 3540-3550.
Todd, N. P. (1995). The kinematics of musical expression. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 97, 1940-1949.
Windsor, W. L., & Clarke, E. F. (1997). Expressive timing and dynamics in real and artifi- cial musical performances: Using an algorithm as an analytical tool. Music Perception, 15, 127-152.
This content is only available via PDF.