Deutsch and coworkers (Deutsch, 1991; Deutsch, North, & Ray, 1990) have proposed that individual differences in the perception of the "tritone paradox" derive from listeners' reference to a mental pitch template, acquired through experience with the pitch range of their own voice, as well as with the voice ranges typical of their language community. These authors have reported a correspondence between perceptual results and the upper limit of the individual voice range for a small group of selected subjects, as well as a striking difference in tritone perception between American and British listeners. The present study compared groups of Dutch, British, and American listeners on two tritone tests and also collected voice pitch data for the first two groups in a reading task. There was no within-group correlation of perceptual results with individual differences in voice range. Differences in tritone perception as a function of stimulus characteristics (spectral envelope) were much larger than reported by Deutsch, which casts doubt on the notion of stable individual pitch templates. A significant difference between British and American listeners, with the Dutch group in between, was found in one of the two tritone tests but not in the other. Although the origin of this difference remains unclear, it seems unlikely that it has anything to do with regional differences in voice pitch range.


(Deutsch, 1992a, 1992b, 1992c)
Hudson & Hol- brook, 1981).
substituting Deutsch's formula for the original Shepard (1964)
(Houtsma, Rossing, & Wagenaars, 1987).
DK-m, GS-m, SC-f, TM-f, MS-f and HS-f. Other subjects had grown up mainly in the Midwest (JJ-m, JC-m, RM-m, MC-f ), the East (ES-m, SL-m, AF-f, PK-f, MR-f), and the South (DW-m, CG-f);
Deutsch (1987).


Boë, L., & Rakotofiringa, H. A statistical analysis of laryngeal frequency: Its relationship to intensity level and duration. Language & Speech, 1975, 18, 1-13.
Collier, R. Multi-language intonation synthesis. Journal of Phonetics, 1991, 19, 61-73.
De Pijper, J. R. Modelling British English intonation. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Foris, 1983.
Deutsch, D. A musical paradox. Music Perception, 1986, 6, 115-132.
Deutsch, D. The tritone paradox: Effects of spectral variables. Perception & Psycho- physics, 1987, 41, 563-575.
Deutsch, D. The tritone paradox: An influence of language on music perception. Music Perception, 1991, 8, 335-347.
Deutsch, D. The tritone paradox: Implications for the representation and communication of pitch structures. In M. R. Jones & S. Holleran (Eds.), Cognitive bases of musical communication. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association, 1992a, pp. 115-138.
Deutsch, D. Paradoxes of musical pitch. Scientific American, 1992b, 267 (2), 88-95.
Deutsch, D. Some new pitch paradoxes and their implications. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, Series B, 1992c, 336, 391-397.
Deutsch, D., Kuyper, W. L., & Fisher, Y. The tritone paradox: Its presence and form of distribution in a general population. Music Perception, 1987, 5, 79-92
Deutsch, D., North, T., & Ray, L. The tritone paradox: Correlate with the listener's vocal ranee for speech. Music Perception, 1990, 7, 371-384,
Hanley, T. An analysis of vocal frequency and duration characteristics of selected samples of speech from three American dialect regions. Speech Monographs, 1951, 18, 78-93.
Hanley, T. D., & Snidecor, J. C. Some acoustic similarities among languages. Phonetica, 1967, 17, 141-148.
Hanley, T. D., Snidecor, J. C, & Ringel, R. L. Some acoustic differences among languages. Phonetics 1966, 14, 97-107.
Hermes, D. J. Measurement of pitch by subharmonic summation. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1988, 83, 257-264.
Hollien, H., & Jackson, B. Normative data on the speaking fundamental frequency charac- teristics of young adult males. Journal of Phonetics, 1973, 1, 117-120.
Horii, Y. Some statistical characteristics of voice fundamental frequency. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 1975, 18, 192-201.
Houtsma, A. J. M., & Fleuren, J. F. M. Analytic and synthetic pitch of two-tone complexes. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1991, 90, 1674-1676.
Houtsma, A. J. M., Rossing, T. D., & Wagenaars, W. M. Auditory demonstrations CD. Acoustical Society of America and Institute for Perceptual Research (IPO), Eindhoven, The Netherlands, 1987.
Hudson, A. I., & Holbrook, A. A study of the reading fundamental frequency of young black adults. Journal of Speech & Hearing Research, 1981, 24, 197-201.
Hudson, A. I., & Holbrook, A. Fundamental frequency characteristics of young black adults: Spontaneous speaking and oral reading. Journal of Speech and Hearing Re- search, 1982,25,25-28.
Jassem, W. Pitch and compass of the speaking voice. Journal of the International Phonetic Association, 1971, 1, 59-68.
Jassem, W., & Kudela-Dobrogowska, K. Speaker-independent intonation curves. In L. R. Waugh & C. H. van Schooneveld (Eds.), The melody of language. Baltimore, MD: University Park Press, 1980, pp. 135-148
Liberman, M., & Pierrehumbert, J. Intonational invariance under changes in pitch range and length. In M. Aronoff & R. Oehrle (Eds.), Language sound and structure. Cam- bridge, MA: MIT Press, 1984, pp. 157-233.
Maeda, S. A characterization of American English intonation. Unpublished doctoral disser- tation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, 1976.
Moore, B. C. J., Glasberg, B. R., & Peters, R. W. Relative dominance of individual partials in determining the pitch of complex tones. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1985, 77, 1853-1860.
Mysak, E. Pitch and duration characteristics or older males. Journal of Speech & Hearing Research, 1959, 2, 46-54.
Ragozzine, F., & Deutsch, D. A regional difference within the United States in perception of the tritone paradox. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1993, 94, 1860. (abstract)
Shepard, R. N. Circularity in judgments of relative pitch. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1964, 36, 2346-2353.
Snidecor, J. A comparative study of the pitch and duration characteristics of impromptu speaking and oral reading. Speech Monographs, 1943, 10, 50-56.
Terhardt, E. Music perception and sensory information acquisition: Relationships and low- level analogies. Music Perception, 1991, 8, 217-240.
Terhardt, E., Stoll, G., Schermbach, R., & Parncutt, R. Tonhöhenmehrdeutigkeit, Tonver- wandtschaft und Identifikation von Sukzessivintervallen. Acustica, 1986, 61, 57-66.
Fernamt, E., Stoll, G., & Seewann, M. Algorithm tor extraction or pitch and pitch salience from complex signals. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1982a, 71, 679-688.
Terhardt, E., Stoll, G., & Seewann, M. Pitch of complex signals according to virtual-pitch theory: Tests, examples, and predictions. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1982b, 71, 671-678.
Terken, J. Baselines revisited: Reply to Ladd. Language & Speech, 1993, 36, 453-459.
't Hart, J., Collier, R., & Cohen, A. A perceptual study of intonation: An experimental- phonetic approach to speech melody. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press, 1990.
Willems, N., Collier, R., & 't Hart, J. A synthesis scheme for British English intonation. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1988, 84, 1250-1261.
Yamazawa, H., & Hollien, H. Speaking fundamental frequency patterns of Japanese women. Phonetica, 1992, 49, 128-140.
This content is only available via PDF.