Discussions of music performance often stress diversity and artistic freedom, yet there is general agreement that interpretation is not arbitrary and that there are standards that performances can be judged by. However, there have been few objective demonstrations of any extant constraints on music performance and judgment, particularly at the level of expressive microstructure. This study illustrates such a constraint in one specific case: the expressive timing of a melodic gesture that occurs repeatedly in Robert Schumann's famous piano piece, "Traumerei." Tone onset timing measurements in 28 recorded performances by famous pianists suggest that the most common " temporal shape" of this (nominally isochronous) musical gesture is parabolic and that individual variations can be described largely by varying a single degree of freedom of the parabolic timing function. The aesthetic validity of this apparent constraint on local performance timing was investigated in a perceptual experiment. Listeners judged a variety of timing patterns (original parabolic, shifted parabolic, and nonparabolic) imposed on the same melodic gesture, produced on an electronic piano under control of a Musical Instrument Digital Interface (MIDI). The original parabolic patterns received the highest ratings from musically trained listeners. (Musically untrained listeners were unable to give consistent judgments.) The results support the hypothesis that there are classes of optimal temporal shapes for melodic gestures in music performance and that musically acculturated listeners know and expect these shapes. Being classes of shapes, they represent flexible constraints within which artistic freedom and individual preference can manifest themselves.

[Footnotes]

[Footnotes]
7
NIH BRSG Grant RR-05596
8
Second International Conference on Music Perception and Cognition in Los Angeles, February 1992.

References

References
Friberg, A. Generative rules for music performance: A formal description of a rule system. Computer Music Journal, 1991, 15, 56-71.
and meter. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 1983, 24, 193-213.
Kronman, U., & Sundberg, J. Is the musical ritard an allusion to physical motion? In A. Gabrielsson (ed.), Action and perception in rhythm and music. Stockholm: Royal Swed- ish Academy of Music, 1987, Pub. No. 55, pp. 57-68.
Lindblom, B. Final lengthening in speech and music. In E. Gårding, G. Bruce, & R. Bannert (eds.), Nordic prosody. Lund, Sweden: Lund University, 1978, pp. 85-101.
Lussy, M. Musical expression: Accents, nuances, and tempo in vocal and instrumental music. London: Novello, 1882.
Palmer, C. Mapping musical thought to musical performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 1989, 15, 331-346.
Repp, B. H. Patterns of expressive timing in performances of a Beethoven minuet by nineteen famous pianists. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1990, 88, 622-641.
Repp, B. H. Diversity and commonality in music performance: An analysis of timing microstructure in Schumann's "Träumerei." Journal of the Acoustical Society of Amer- ica, 1992, 92 (in press).
Seashore, C. E. Psychology of music. New York: McGraw-Hill/Dover, 1967. (Original work published 1938)
Shaffer, L. H. Performances of Chopin, Bach, and Bartók: Studies in motor programming. Cognitive Psychology, 1981, 13, 326-376.
Sundberg, J., Friberg, A.,&Frydén, L. Threshold and preference quantities of rules for music performance. Music Perception, 1991, 9, 71-91.
Sundberg, J., & Verrillo, V. On the anatomy of the retard: A study of timing in music. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1980, 68, 772-779.
Todd, N. A model of expressive timing in tonal music. Music Perception, 1985, 3, 33-58.
Todd, N. A computational model of rubato. Contemporary Music Review, 1989, 3, 69- 88.
Todd, N. The kinematics of musical expression. Manuscript submitted for publication, 1992.
This content is only available via PDF.