The extent to which a computer-synthesized continuum of major to minor triads was categorically perceived was examined using labeling and discrimination tests. The 32 listeners varied widely in " musicality," assessed by an objective test of basic musical skills. There was a strong positive relationship between musicality and ability to label the major/minor continuum consistently ( measured by the slope of the labeling function). Overall discrimination performance varied only weakly with musicality, although the pattern of discrimination performance across the continuum differed strongly among three listener subgroups, distinguished on the basis of musicality. The most "musical" listeners showed a close relationship between the position of the discrimination peak and the category boundary calculated from the labeling function, a strong indicator of categorical perception. On similar criteria, the evidence for categorical perception was nonexistent in the least musical listeners and moderate in an intermediate group. From the evidence that the extent of categorical perception appears to vary in a graded fashion with the degree of musicality, we conclude that categorical perception can arise primarily through a process of learning.

[Footnotes]

[Footnotes]
3
(Payne, 1987).
4
(Draper & Smith, 1981).

References

References
Burns, E. M., & Ward, W. D. Categorical perception—phenomenon or epiphenomenon: evidence from experiments in the perception of melodic intervals. Journal of the Acous- tical Society of America, 1978, 63, 456-468.
Burns, E. M., & Ward, W. D. Intervals, scales and tuning. In: D. Deutsch (Ed.), The psychology of music. London: Academic Press, 1982, pp. 241-269.
Draper, N. R., & Smith, H. Applied regression analysis (2nd éd.). New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1981.
Finney, D. J. Probit analysis (3rd éd.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1971.
Hazan, V., Fourcin, A., & Abberton, E. Development of phonetic labeling in hearing- impaired children. Ear and Hearing, 1991, 12, 71-84.
Liberman, A. L. The grammars of speech and language. Cognitive Psychology, 1970, 1, 301-323.
Liberman, A. L., Harris, K. S., Hoffman, H. S., & Griffith, B. S. The discrimination of speech sounds within and across phoneme boundaries. Journal of Experimental Psy- chology, 1957, 54, 358-368.
Liberman, A. L., Harris, K. S., Kinney, J. A., & Lane, H. The discrimination of relative onset time of the components of certain speech and nonspeech patterns. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1961, 61, 379-388.
Locke, S., &; Kellar, L. Categorical perception in a non linguistic mode. Cortex, 1973, 9, 355-369.
Macmillan, N. A. Beyond the categorical/continuous distinction: A psychophysical ap- proach to processing modes. In: S. Harnad (Ed.), Categorical perception. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1987, pp. 53-85.
Macmillan, N. A., Kaplan, H. L., & Creelman, C. D. The psychophysics of categorical perception. Psychological Review, 1977, 84, 452-471.
Medin, D. L.,&Barsalou, L. W. Categorization processes and categorical perception. In: S. Harnad (Ed.), Categorical perception. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1987, 455–490.
Pastore, R. E. Categorical perception: A critical réévaluation. In: S. K. Hirsh, D. H. El- dredge, I.J. Hirsh, & S. R. Silverman (Eds.), Hearing and Davis: Essays honoring Hallowell Davis. St. Louis: Washington University Press, 1976.
Pastore, R. E., Schmuckler, M. A., Rosenblum, L., & Szczesiul, R. Duplex perception with musical stimuli. Perception & Psychophysics, 1983, 33: 469-474.
Payne, C. D. The generalized linear interactive modelling system: Release 3.77, (2nd ed.). London: Royal Statistical Society, 1987.
Rosen, S., & Howell, P. Auditory, articulatory and learning explanations of categorical perception in speech. In: S. Harnad (Ed.), Categorical perception. Cambridge: Cam- bridge University press, 1987, pp. 113-160.
SAS Institute Inc. Additional SAS/STAT™ procedures. SAS® Technical Report P-179, Release 6.03. Cary, NC: SAS Institute Inc., 1988.
SAS Institute Inc. SAS/STAT™ guide for personal computers (Version 6 edition). Cary, NC: SAS Institute Inc., 1987.
Simon, C, & Fourcin, A. J. A cross-language study of speech-pattern learning. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1978, 63: 925-935.
Studdert-Kennedy, M., Liberman, A. M., Harris, K. S., & Cooper, F. S. Motor theory of speech perception: a reply to Lane's critical review. Psychological Review, 1970, 77, 234-249.
Zatorre, R. J.,&Halpern, A. R. Identification, discrimination, and selective adaption of simultaneous musical intervals. Perception and Psychophysics, 1979, 26, 384-395.
This content is only available via PDF.