This article explores the historical development of common-practice musical style and how that development might connect to the cognition of key within the history of Western European tonality. First, musical corpora of 19 composers were divided into three-chord progressions, and these progressions were tallied. The chord tallies were used for a cluster analysis and for measurements of inter-corpus cross entropy. The cluster analysis divided the corpora in ways that conform to historical and stylistic intuitions, and inter-corpus cross entropy was found to correlate with the years separating the corpora. These findings show that the chronological distance between two musical corpora seems to predict compositional similarity and that chord-progression norms are connected to specific historical situations. In order to model how these changes might affect the cognition of musical key, a corpus-sensitive key-finding algorithm was used to decode key within a famous example of musical ambiguity, the opening of Beethoven’s “Eroica” symphony. Each corpus-trained model created a slightly different key interpretation, suggesting that historically situated models of tonal cognition might indeed interpret the same stimulus differently.
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
February 2014
Research Article|
February 01 2014
Changing Styles, Changing Corpora, Changing Tonal Models
Christopher Wm. White
University of North Carolina, Greensboro
Christopher White, School of Music, Theatre and Dance; The University of North Carolina at Greensboro; PO Box 26170; Greensboro, NC 27402-6170. E-mail: cwwhite@uncg.edu
Search for other works by this author on:
Christopher White, School of Music, Theatre and Dance; The University of North Carolina at Greensboro; PO Box 26170; Greensboro, NC 27402-6170. E-mail: cwwhite@uncg.edu
Music Perception (2014) 31 (3): 244–253.
Article history
Received:
October 28 2012
Accepted:
April 11 2013
Citation
Christopher Wm. White; Changing Styles, Changing Corpora, Changing Tonal Models. Music Perception 1 February 2014; 31 (3): 244–253. doi: https://doi.org/10.1525/mp.2014.31.3.244
Download citation file:
Sign in
Don't already have an account? Register
Client Account
You could not be signed in. Please check your email address / username and password and try again.
Could not validate captcha. Please try again.