psychoacoustic theories of dissonance often follow Helmholtz and attribute it to partials (fundamental frequencies or overtones) near enough in frequency to affect the same region of the basilar membrane and therefore to cause roughness, i.e., rapid beating. In contrast, tonal theories attribute dissonance to violations of harmonic principles embodied in Western music. We propose a dual-process theory that embeds roughness within tonal principles. The theory predicts the robust increasing trend in the dissonance of triads: major < minor < diminished < augmented. Previous experiments used too few chords for a comprehensive test of the theory, and so Experiment 1 examined the rated dissonance of all 55 possible three-note chords, and Experiment 2 examined a representative sample of 48 of the possible four-note chords. The participants' ratings concurred reliably and corroborated the dual-process theory. Experiment 3 showed that, as the theory predicts, consonant chords are rated as less dissonant when they occur in a tonal sequence (the cycle of fifths) than in a random sequence, whereas this manipulation has no reliable effect on dissonant chords outside common musical practice.
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
September 2012
Research Article|
September 01 2012
On Musical Dissonance
Phil N. Johnson-Laird,
Princeton University
Correspondence concerning this article should be addressed to Phil Johnson-Laird, Department of Psychology, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ 08540. e-mail: [email protected]
Search for other works by this author on:
Yuan Chang Leong
Yuan Chang Leong
Princeton University
Search for other works by this author on:
Correspondence concerning this article should be addressed to Phil Johnson-Laird, Department of Psychology, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ 08540. e-mail: [email protected]
Music Perception (2012) 30 (1): 19–35.
Article history
Received:
December 10 2010
Accepted:
September 24 2011
Citation
Phil N. Johnson-Laird, Olivia E. Kang, Yuan Chang Leong; On Musical Dissonance. Music Perception 1 September 2012; 30 (1): 19–35. doi: https://doi.org/10.1525/mp.2012.30.1.19
Download citation file:
Sign in
Don't already have an account? Register
Client Account
You could not be signed in. Please check your email address / username and password and try again.
Could not validate captcha. Please try again.