A POPULAR THEORY HOLDS THAT "SWING" STEMS specifically from asynchronous timing between bass and drums in their shared articulation of the beat, a phenomenon Charles Keil has dubbed "participatory discrepancies" (PDs; Keil, 1987). The "push and pull" between these instruments purportedly generates a "productive tension" thought to drive the groove with energy. This paper presents the results of two experiments on the perception of PDs. Experiment 1 employed synthetic recordings of a conventional swing groove in which the onset asynchronies between bass and drums were varied. Participants used three listening strategies to perceive the asynchrony and its purported effects. Experiment 2 employed recordings of professional jazz musicians and tested for the effects of learning in the perception of PDs. Little evidence emerged from either experiment in support of the PD framework. An alternative proposal drawn from metric entrainment theory explains the effects of PDs as more limited and local than previously thought.
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
February 2010
Research Article|
February 01 2010
Participatory Discrepancies and the Perception of Beats in Jazz
Matthew Butterfield
Matthew Butterfield
Franklin & Marshall College
Search for other works by this author on:
Music Perception (2010) 27 (3): 157–176.
Citation
Matthew Butterfield; Participatory Discrepancies and the Perception of Beats in Jazz. Music Perception 1 February 2010; 27 (3): 157–176. doi: https://doi.org/10.1525/mp.2010.27.3.157
Download citation file:
Sign in
Don't already have an account? Register
Client Account
You could not be signed in. Please check your email address / username and password and try again.
Could not validate captcha. Please try again.