If we consider the culture of building, measured drawings are not the norm. Most structures, especially vernacular ones, are the work of builders—masons, bricklayers, and craftspeople, among others—who construct spaces without recourse to drawings. However, drawing is a multifaceted concept, and one could argue that such builders’ use of strings to straighten wooden planks or determine levels and their tracing of ornamental lines onto stones are all forms of drawing. Yet, beginning with the European Renaissance, drawing with pencil and paper was most closely associated with the formation of architecture as distinct from building. In Asia, Africa, and the Americas, the practice of drawing spaces and buildings has a longer history that is not tied to European definitions of architect and architecture. In these cases, drawing and building were often not discrete practices, such that the outlining of a boundary or the paint on an adobe wall could be both...
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
December 2022
Book Review|
December 01 2022
Review: Survey: Architecture Iconographies
Matthew Wells
Survey: Architecture Iconographies
Zurich
: Park Books
, 2021
, 176 pp., 102 and 13 b/w illus. $50 (paper), ISBN 9783038602507
Min Kyung Lee
Min Kyung Lee
Bryn Mawr College
Search for other works by this author on:
Journal of the Society of Architectural Historians (2022) 81 (4): 529–531.
Citation
Min Kyung Lee; Review: Survey: Architecture Iconographies. Journal of the Society of Architectural Historians 1 December 2022; 81 (4): 529–531. doi: https://doi.org/10.1525/jsah.2022.81.4.529
Download citation file:
Sign in
Don't already have an account? Register
Client Account
You could not be signed in. Please check your email address / username and password and try again.
Could not validate captcha. Please try again.