Though both men worked for Fascist patrons, Ponti's and Terragni's different political attitudes represent varying relationships between architecture and power. Ponti was imbued with bourgeois moderation, politically and culturally, and therefore stood outside the Italian avant-garde. He presented himself in Domus—the journal he founded in 1928—as an architectural reformer, not as a revolutionary. By contrast, from 1928 to 1931, Terragni and his fellows of Gruppo 7 and Movimento Italiano per l'Architettura Razionale (MIAR) campaigned to convince Mussolini that rationalism was the fittest architectural response to the Fascist agenda—that is, to a regime that presented itself as revolutionary, they presented themselves as fellow revolutionaries. Giorgio Ciucci, in his...
Skip Nav Destination
Editorial| March 01 2019
Manfredo di Robilant's reply to Kurt Forster
Journal of the Society of Architectural Historians (2019) 78 (1): 135–136.
- Views Icon Views
- Share Icon Share
- Search Site
Manfredo di Robilant; Manfredo di Robilant's reply to Kurt Forster. Journal of the Society of Architectural Historians 1 March 2019; 78 (1): 135–136. doi: https://doi.org/10.1525/jsah.2019.78.1.135b
Download citation file: