Of all the cities founded by the British in the colonial era, Bombay (now known as Mumbai) has most captured the imagination of writers. Over the past decade or so it has served as one of the primary subjects of a rich body of scholarship that vastly expands our understanding of the complexities of nineteenth- and early twentieth-century colonial cities in South Asia. This scholarship shows the important role of local populations in the making, imagining, and inhabiting of the colonial city, thus not only providing compelling insights into the architecture and urbanism of this era but also adding nuance to our understanding of colonial processes that shaped the urban environment. Nikhil Rao’s House, but No Garden, which focuses on the construction and inhabitation of apartments as a new residential mode of dwelling as well as on global processes of suburbanization, is an important contribution to this emerging body...
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
December 2015
Book Review|
December 01 2015
Review: House, but No Garden: Apartment Living in Bombay’s Suburbs, 1898–1964, by Nikhil Rao
Nikhil Rao
House, but No Garden: Apartment Living in Bombay’s Suburbs, 1898–1964
Minneapolis
: University of Minnesota Press
, 2013
, 312 pp., 2 tables, 53 b/w illus. $90 (cloth), ISBN 9780816678129; $30 (paper), ISBN 9780816678136
Preeti Chopra
Preeti Chopra
1University of Wisconsin–Madison
Search for other works by this author on:
Journal of the Society of Architectural Historians (2015) 74 (4): 508–509.
Citation
Preeti Chopra; Review: House, but No Garden: Apartment Living in Bombay’s Suburbs, 1898–1964, by Nikhil Rao. Journal of the Society of Architectural Historians 1 December 2015; 74 (4): 508–509. doi: https://doi.org/10.1525/jsah.2015.74.4.508
Download citation file:
Sign in
Don't already have an account? Register
Client Account
You could not be signed in. Please check your email address / username and password and try again.