Landscape architecture—or perhaps the landscape—features prominently in contemporary design discourses. Seemingly all-encompassing, landscape practitioners intervene on post-industrial sites and regions; they envision scenarios for shrinking cities, hypercities, informal settlements, and shifting riparian zones. It should then come as no surprise that the frequency with which landscape is addressed by curators has recently increased, with Rising Currents at MoMA; Stadtgrün at the Frankfurt Architecture Museum; ManMade Environment initiated by Oslo’s DogA and later shown in Copenhagen, Stockholm, and now Helsinki; and La Ville fertile and Roberto Burle Marx at the Cité de l’Architecture in Paris. This sampling reflects not only the wide range of scales—garden to waterfront—that characterizes designing with/in the landscape but also the competing claims on landscape, greening, and sustainability by landscape architects, architects, and artists. In this fuzzy context, Roberto Burle Marx: La Permanence de l’instable, to whose catalogue this reviewer contributed an essay without in any...
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
June 2012
Review Article|
June 01 2012
Review: Roberto Burle Marx: La Permanence de l’instable Available to Purchase
Roberto Burle Marx: La Permanence de l’instable
. Cité de l’Architecture et du Patrimoine, Paris. 23 March–11 July 2011
Dorothée Imbert
Dorothée Imbert
1Washington University
Search for other works by this author on:
Journal of the Society of Architectural Historians (2012) 71 (2): 246–248.
Citation
Dorothée Imbert; Review: Roberto Burle Marx: La Permanence de l’instable. Journal of the Society of Architectural Historians 1 June 2012; 71 (2): 246–248. doi: https://doi.org/10.1525/jsah.2012.71.2.246
Download citation file:
Sign in
Don't already have an account? Register
Client Account
You could not be signed in. Please check your email address / username and password and try again.
Could not validate captcha. Please try again.