In the opening weeks of his administration, President Donald Trump overturned a longstanding U.S. commitment to territorial partition and a two-state model for resolving the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. Israeli prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu seized the opportunity to demand “overriding security control over the entire area west of the Jordan River” while exploring regional approaches that bypass the Palestinians. At the same time, a host of Israeli politicians are reviving older models such as limited autonomy without political sovereignty and partial territorial annexation, or advocating for other forms of separation with Israel’s continued control. The resulting middle ground—neither two states nor one—poses a great risk to Palestinian self-determination. By situating recent developments in a broader historical context going back to the autonomy plan of Israeli prime minister Menachem Begin, this essay provides an overview of a shifting political discourse and examines the consequences for the fate of the Palestinians today.
Neither Two States nor One: The Palestine Question in the Age of Trump
Seth Anziska is the Mohamed S. Farsi-Polonsky Lecturer in Jewish-Muslim Relations at University College London. His first book, on the fate of Palestinian self-determination in the 1970s and 1980s, Preventing Palestine, will be published by Princeton University Press.
- Views Icon Views
- Share Icon Share
- Search Site
Seth Anziska; Neither Two States nor One: The Palestine Question in the Age of Trump. Journal of Palestine Studies 1 May 2017; 46 (3): 57–74. doi: https://doi.org/10.1525/jps.2017.46.3.57
Download citation file: