This article examines competing legal frameworks in dispute resolution in the occupied territories, against the background of weakening central authority, bitter political rivalries, and increasing insecurity on the ground. Two case studies from 2005 are presented——a killing in Gaza and an attempted sexual assault in the West Bank——where the involved parties had recourse to three distinct but overlapping bodies of law, not all of which were part of the formal Palestinian legal system: statutory law, Islamic law, and customary (or tribal) law. The resolution of these cases, while shedding light on the intersection of local politics and alternative legal systems, underscores the challenges of forging a united legal system in a situation of occupation, weak government, and heterogeneous legal heritage.
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
January 2009
Research Article|
January 01 2009
The Bedouin Judge, the Mufti, and the Chief Islamic Justice: Competing Legal Regimes in the Occupied Palestinian Territories
Lynn Welchman
Lynn Welchman
Lynn Welchman is Professor of Law at the School of Oriental and African Studies in the University of London.
Search for other works by this author on:
Journal of Palestine Studies (2009) 38 (2): 6–23.
Citation
Lynn Welchman; The Bedouin Judge, the Mufti, and the Chief Islamic Justice: Competing Legal Regimes in the Occupied Palestinian Territories. Journal of Palestine Studies 1 January 2009; 38 (2): 6–23. doi: https://doi.org/10.1525/jps.2009.38.2.6
Download citation file:
Sign in
Don't already have an account? Register
Client Account
You could not be signed in. Please check your email address / username and password and try again.
Could not validate captcha. Please try again.