Since the 1967 war, Jerusalem and the Jewish holy places have acquired a new centrality even in the traditionally secular Labor Zionist vision. After noting a parallel shift toward religiosity among the early Christians following the excavation of the Holy Sepulchre, the author discusses the connection between sacred relics and identity as well as the impulse to demolish rival artifacts and claims. Drawing numerous examples from history and scripture to illustrate her points, the author traces the city's changing importance to the three faiths over the centuries, correlating the intensity of feeling with perceptions of threat or loss. Finally, she examines the differing concepts of holiness, contrasting the traditionally pluralist Muslim vision of holiness with Judaism's and Christianity's more exclusivist cult of the city's sanctity. The article ends with a discussion of David's conquest of Jerusalem, which leaves scope for greater inclusiveness than is generally assumed.
Skip Nav Destination
Close
Article navigation
April 1998
Research Article|
April 01 1998
The Holiness of Jerusalem: Asset or Burden?
Journal of Palestine Studies (1998) 27 (3): 5–19.
Citation
Karen Armstrong; The Holiness of Jerusalem: Asset or Burden?. Journal of Palestine Studies 1 April 1998; 27 (3): 5–19. doi: https://doi.org/10.2307/2537831
Download citation file:
Close
Sign in
Don't already have an account? Register
Client Account
You could not be signed in. Please check your email address / username and password and try again.