This article maps the controversy over whether and where glaciers once flowed through the Japanese Alps. Focusing on the first decades of this century-long debate, we examine how a small-scale revolution in geological thinking was shaped by the particular institutional constraints and alpine enthusiasms of Meiji Japan (1868–1912). To do so, we turn to Yamasaki Naomasa and Kojima Usui—close friends and pioneers in their respective fields of geography and mountaineering—to show how alpinism helped to launch glaciology as a scientific discipline in Japan. By chronicling the hunt for evidence of ancient glaciers, we further reveal how the Japanese Alpine Club formed a vital forum for the glacier debate pending the emergence of a community of professional glaciologists.
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
June 2019
Research Article|
June 01 2019
Hotly Debated Ice: Scholar Alpinism and the Great Glacier Controversy in Modern Japan
David Fedman,
David Fedman
Department of History, University of California, Irvine, 200 Murray Krieger Hall, Irvine, California, 92697-3275; dfedman@uci.edu
Search for other works by this author on:
Martin Hood
Martin Hood
Academic Alpine Club of Zürich, Akademischer Alpenclub Zürich, AACZ, 8000 Zürich; martinshood@hotmail.com
Search for other works by this author on:
Historical Studies in the Natural Sciences (2019) 49 (3): 273–299.
Citation
David Fedman, Martin Hood; Hotly Debated Ice: Scholar Alpinism and the Great Glacier Controversy in Modern Japan. Historical Studies in the Natural Sciences 1 June 2019; 49 (3): 273–299. doi: https://doi.org/10.1525/hsns.2019.49.3.273
Download citation file:
Sign in
Don't already have an account? Register
Client Account
You could not be signed in. Please check your email address / username and password and try again.
Could not validate captcha. Please try again.