In the last two decades, a highly instrumentalist form of statistical and machine learning has achieved an extraordinary success as the computational heart of the phenomenon glossed as “predictive analytics,” “data mining,” or “data science.” This instrumentalist culture of prediction emerged from subfields within applied statistics, artificial intelligence, and database management. This essay looks at representative developments within computational statistics and pattern recognition from the 1950s onward, in the United States and beyond, central to the explosion of algorithms, techniques, and epistemic values that ultimately came together in the data sciences of today. This essay is part of a special issue entitled Histories of Data and the Database edited by Soraya de Chadarevian and Theodore M. Porter.
Research Article| November 01 2018
How We Became Instrumentalists (Again): Data Positivism since World War II
Historical Studies in the Natural Sciences (2018) 48 (5): 673–684.
- Views Icon Views
- PDF LinkPDF
- Share Icon Share
- Tools Icon Tools
- Search Site
Matthew L. Jones; How We Became Instrumentalists (Again): Data Positivism since World War II. Historical Studies in the Natural Sciences 1 November 2018; 48 (5): 673–684. doi: https://doi.org/10.1525/hsns.2018.48.5.673
Download citation file: