Archives are powerful. On this, at least, historians agree. But when it comes to why they are so powerful and how that power should be used, a great deal is up for debate. Some see the archive as the bedrock of empirical work; if not objective, the archive is as close as we can get to a shared source base from which to tell authoritative histories. To others, the archive’s power is wielded by those who assemble and oversee it—sometimes, against those whose names and lives appear within its boxes. Archives are fetishized and feared, at times by the same people; their boundaries can be policed with vigor or rendered porous through critique. But at the end of the day, they are powerful—and that is what keeps people coming back year after year, attempting to draw out their secrets or tear down their walls. It is almost harder to imagine...
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
February 2023
Introduction|
February 01 2023
Introduction Available to Purchase
Taylor M. Moore,
Assistant Professor, Department of History, University of California, Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, CA 93106
Search for other works by this author on:
Henry M. Cowles,
Associate Professor, Department of History, University of Michigan, 1029 Tisch Hall, 435 S. State St., Ann Arbor, MI 48109
Search for other works by this author on:
Chitra Ramalingam
Program in History of Science and Medicine, Yale University, 320 York Street, New Haven, CT 06511
Search for other works by this author on:
Historical Studies in the Natural Sciences (2023) 53 (1): 71–72.
Citation
Taylor M. Moore, Henry M. Cowles, Chitra Ramalingam; Introduction. Historical Studies in the Natural Sciences 1 February 2023; 53 (1): 71–72. doi: https://doi.org/10.1525/hsns.2023.53.1.71
Download citation file:
Sign in
Don't already have an account? Register
Client Account
You could not be signed in. Please check your email address / username and password and try again.
Could not validate captcha. Please try again.