Since its inception in the 18th century, the discipline of the history of science has served a motley collection of extrinsic disciplinary interests, philosophical ideas, and cultural movements. This paper examines the historiographical implications of modernism and postmodernism and shows how they in.uenced positivist, postpositivist, and sociological interpretations of the Chemical Revolution. It also shows how these interpretations served the disciplinary interests of science, phi-losophy, and sociology, respectively, and it points toward a model of the history of science as history.
Skip Nav Destination
Review Article| March 01 2007
Modernism, postmodernism and the historiography of science
Historical Studies in the Physical and Biological Sciences (2007) 37 (2): 383–408.
- Views Icon Views
- Share Icon Share
- Search Site
John G. Mcevoy; Modernism, postmodernism and the historiography of science. Historical Studies in the Physical and Biological Sciences 1 March 2007; 37 (2): 383–408. doi: https://doi.org/10.1525/hsps.2007.37.2.383
Download citation file: