In this paper, we analyze two global projects, twenty-five years apart—the report of the Gulbenkian Commission, published for the first time in Spanish in 1996, and the open science project, known more widely since the approval of the UNESCO Recommendation on Open Science of 2021—from the perspective of Latin America. In the first section, we revisit the program proposed by Immanuel Wallerstein in the Gulbenkian Report to “open the social sciences” and its main pillars. We then relate this project to the idea of citizen science, the FAIR and CARE principles, and the need to advance participatory science practices with informational justice. Afterwards, we analyze the Latin American path for open science and collaborative infrastructure that has been developing since the 1950s. We analyze the intellectual, institutional, and political conditions that allow our region to carve its own path for open science—and the extent to which the social sciences participate in that process and are affected or promoted by it. Finally, we discuss the critical role of the region’s evaluation systems in producing a transformation that reaches the magnitude of open science, without subalternizing the communities that participate in the co-production of open knowledges.
Skip Nav Destination
Research Article| January 31 2024
Opening the Social Sciences: Questioning Eurocentrism and Implementing Contextualized Open Science
Fernanda Beigel; Opening the Social Sciences: Questioning Eurocentrism and Implementing Contextualized Open Science. Global Perspectives 31 January 2024; 5 (1): 91203. doi: https://doi.org/10.1525/gp.2023.91203
Download citation file: