This article presents a detailed case study of “RoboDebt” in Australia and examines the political rationalities that underpin automated welfare surveillance systems. First, it is argued that neoliberal political rationalities shape the bureaucratic strategies enacted by agencies established to administer neoliberal welfare policy. Second, it is shown that neoliberal political rationalities influence the design and deployment of new surveillance technologies, and therefore they are embedded with and within politics too. Third, it is argued that the political architecture of the welfare state and associated use of information communication technologies has consequences for social justice. This article demonstrates that information communication technologies are implicated in the neoliberal governance of poverty but are not responsible for it. The article concludes by reflecting on the relevance of critical qualitative inquiry as one possible political intervention to advance social (and data) justice agendas.
Skip Nav Destination
Research Article| June 19 2020
Technological Politics of Automated Welfare Surveillance: Social (and Data) Justice through Critical Qualitative Inquiry
Collections:Special Collection: Datafication and the Welfare State , Section: Communication and Media
Global Perspectives (2020) 1 (1): 12991.
- Views Icon Views
- Share Icon Share
- Search Site
Monique Mann; Technological Politics of Automated Welfare Surveillance: Social (and Data) Justice through Critical Qualitative Inquiry. Global Perspectives 11 May 2020; 1 (1): 12991. doi: https://doi.org/10.1525/gp.2020.12991
Download citation file: